Cited by 163Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePain Management and Opioid Use

Patient race and physicians' decisions to prescribe opioids for chronic low back pain

Burgess, Diana Jill, Crowley-Matoka, Megan, Phelan, Sean, Dovidio, John F., Kerns, Robert, Roth, Craig, Saha, Somnath, van Ryn, Michelle·2008·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Nonwhite patients are less likely than white patients to have their pain adequately treated. This study examined the influence of patient race and patient verbal and nonverbal behavior on primary care physicians' treatment decisions for chronic low back pain in men. We randomly assigned physicians to receive a paper-based, clinical vignette of a chronic pain patient that differed in terms of patient race (white vs. black), verbal behavior ("challenging" vs. "non-challenging"), and nonverbal behavior (confident vs. dejected vs. angry). We employed a between-subjects factorial design and surveyed primary care physicians (N=382), randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The primary dependent measure was the physician's decision as to whether (s)he would switch the patient to a higher dose or stronger type of opioid. Logistic regression was used to determine the effects of patient characteristics on physicians' prescribing decisions. There was a significant interaction between patient verbal behavior and patient race on physicians' decisions to prescribe opioids. Among black patients, physicians were significantly more likely to state that they would switch to a higher dose or stronger opioid for patients exhibiting "challenging" behaviors (e.g., demanding a specific narcotic, exhibiting anger) compared to those exhibiting "non-challenging" behaviors (55.1%). For white patients there was an opposite pattern of results in which physicians were…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that study, black patients who exhibited 'challenging' behaviour were more likely to be prescribed opioids than those who did not.

    “but found an interaction whereby black patients who exhibited ‘challenging’ behaviour (such as belligerence and asking for a specific opioid) were more likely to be prescribed opioids than those who did not”
  • The interaction in that study may be due to a racial stereotype.

    “an effect possibly due to a racial stereotype [43].”
  • A study failed to find differences due to patient race in the prescription of opioids.

    “A further study failed to find differences due to patient race in the prescription of opioids”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgess, D. J., Crowley-Matoka, M., Phelan, S., Dovidio, J. F., Kerns, R., Roth, C., Saha, S., & van Ryn, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Diana Jill
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
67
Issue
11
Pages
1852-1860
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980688673
Cited by
163
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
patient race, chronic low back pain, opioid prescribing, physician decision-making, nonverbal behavior, Black patients, pain management, clinical vignettes, primary care physicians
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prejudice, United States, Odds Ratio, Patient Simulation, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review