Patient race and physicians' decisions to prescribe opioids for chronic low back pain
Abstract
Nonwhite patients are less likely than white patients to have their pain adequately treated. This study examined the influence of patient race and patient verbal and nonverbal behavior on primary care physicians' treatment decisions for chronic low back pain in men. We randomly assigned physicians to receive a paper-based, clinical vignette of a chronic pain patient that differed in terms of patient race (white vs. black), verbal behavior ("challenging" vs. "non-challenging"), and nonverbal behavior (confident vs. dejected vs. angry). We employed a between-subjects factorial design and surveyed primary care physicians (N=382), randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The primary dependent measure was the physician's decision as to whether (s)he would switch the patient to a higher dose or stronger type of opioid. Logistic regression was used to determine the effects of patient characteristics on physicians' prescribing decisions. There was a significant interaction between patient verbal behavior and patient race on physicians' decisions to prescribe opioids. Among black patients, physicians were significantly more likely to state that they would switch to a higher dose or stronger opioid for patients exhibiting "challenging" behaviors (e.g., demanding a specific narcotic, exhibiting anger) compared to those exhibiting "non-challenging" behaviors (55.1%). For white patients there was an opposite pattern of results in which physicians were…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In that study, black patients who exhibited 'challenging' behaviour were more likely to be prescribed opioids than those who did not.
“but found an interaction whereby black patients who exhibited ‘challenging’ behaviour (such as belligerence and asking for a specific opioid) were more likely to be prescribed opioids than those who did not”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
The interaction in that study may be due to a racial stereotype.
“an effect possibly due to a racial stereotype [43].”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
A study failed to find differences due to patient race in the prescription of opioids.
“A further study failed to find differences due to patient race in the prescription of opioids”
From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race
Cooper, L. A., Roter, D. L., Johnson, R. L., Ford, D. E., Steinwachs, D. M., & Powe, N. R. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009 · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002) · Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.88 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Self-citationPrejudice, clinical uncertainty and stereotyping as sources of health disparities
Balsa, A. I., & McGuire, T. G. (2003) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00098-x · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it?
Burgess, D. J., Fu, S. S., & Ryn, M. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30227.x · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
FitzGerald, C., & Hurst, S. (2017) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 · Cited by 2,398 · see citing works
Opioid crisis: no easy fix to its social and economic determinants
Dasgupta, N., Beletsky, L., & Ciccarone, D. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.304187 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Browne, A. J., Varcoe, C., Lavoie, J., Smye, V., Wong, S. T., Krause, M., Tu, D., Godwin, O., Khan, K., & Fridkin, A. (2016) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1707-9 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Racial/ethnic disparities in the assessment and treatment of pain: Psychosocial perspectives.
Tait, R. C., & Chibnall, J. T. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0035204 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Medical and Nonmedical Use of Prescription Opioids Among High School Seniors in the United States
McCabe, S. E. (2012) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.85 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burgess, D. J., Crowley-Matoka, M., Phelan, S., Dovidio, J. F., Kerns, R., Roth, C., Saha, S., & van Ryn, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burgess, Diana Jill
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1852-1860
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980688673
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Health Services Research and Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- patient race, chronic low back pain, opioid prescribing, physician decision-making, nonverbal behavior, Black patients, pain management, clinical vignettes, primary care physicians
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prejudice, United States, Odds Ratio, Patient Simulation, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review