CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,375Mental Health Treatment and AccessEmployment and Welfare StudiesHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Poverty and common mental disorders in low and middle income countries: A systematic review

Open access
Lund, Crick, Breen, Alison, Flisher, Alan J., Kakuma, Ritsuko, Corrigall, Joanne, Joska, John A., Swartz, Leslie, Patel, Vikram·2010·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027PMC PMC4991761
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In spite of high levels of poverty in low and middle income countries (LMIC), and the high burden posed by common mental disorders (CMD), it is only in the last two decades that research has emerged that empirically addresses the relationship between poverty and CMD in these countries. We conducted a systematic review of the epidemiological literature in LMIC, with the aim of examining this relationship. Of 115 studies that were reviewed, most reported positive associations between a range of poverty indicators and CMD. In community-based studies, 73% and 79% of studies reported positive associations between a variety of poverty measures and CMD, 19% and 15% reported null associations and 8% and 6% reported negative associations, using bivariate and multivariate analyses respectively. However, closer examination of specific poverty dimensions revealed a complex picture, in which there was substantial variation between these dimensions. While variables such as education, food insecurity, housing, social class, socio-economic status and financial stress exhibit a relatively consistent and strong association with CMD, others such as income, employment and particularly consumption are more equivocal. There are several measurement and population factors that may explain variation in the strength of the relationship between poverty and CMD. By presenting a systematic review of the literature, this paper attempts to shift the debate from questions about whether poverty is associated with CMD in LMIC, to questions about which particular dimensions of poverty carry the strongest (or weakest) association. The relatively consistent association between CMD and a variety of poverty dimensions in LMIC serves to strengthen the case for the inclusion of mental health on the agenda of development agencies and in international targets such as the millenium development goals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Academies Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,375

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lund, C., Breen, A., Flisher, A. J., Kakuma, R., Corrigall, J., Joska, J. A., Swartz, L., & Patel, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Lund, Crick
ORCID
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
517-528
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027
PMC
PMC4991761
OpenAlex
W2068380169
Cited by
1,375
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 138 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 38
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Department for International Development (DfID)
  • Western Cape Department of Health
  • International Development Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
poverty, common mental disorders, low- and middle-income countries, poverty dimensions, food insecurity, housing, social class, socioeconomic status, financial stress, Millennium Development Goals
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Developing Countries, Humans, Poverty, Multivariate Analysis, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review