Cited by 51Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthObesity and Health Practices

Stigmatisation of those with mental health conditions in the acute general hospital setting. A qualitative framework synthesis

Open access
Perry, Amanda, Lawrence, Vanessa, Henderson, Claire·2020·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Rationale Patients with long-term mental health conditions often have complex physical, mental, and social needs. They are frequent users of the acute general healthcare system, but can experience stigmatising attitudes and behaviours, and structural discrimination. We wished to improve understanding of stigmatisation in the acute healthcare setting, to target areas for future intervention.Objective A synthesis of qualitative literature was undertaken in order to understand how patients with long-term mental health conditions are stigmatised, or otherwise treated, within the acute healthcare system.Method A theory-driven framework approach was implemented. Existing stigma theory was used to outline a framework for categorizing stigmatising and non-stigmatising phenomena within the acute healthcare system.Results A systematic literature search of qualitative studies identified a sample of 51 studies that would inform the framework. Using data in these studies, a final theoretical 'best fit' framework was developed. In this framework there is an overarching pattern of labelling and stereotyping, plus five ways in which patients with mental health conditions are stigmatised in the acute healthcare system: devaluation, social control, avoidance, rejection, and failure to act. In addition, the framework outlines positive attitudes and behaviours - valuing, adjustment, responding, legitimising, and positive action - which contrast with the stigmatisation patterns.Conclusions The study offers a framework for identifying stigmatisation and positive treatment of those with mental health conditions in an acute health setting. This framework is of potential value in targeting areas for improved quality of care and may have utility beyond this setting and stigmatised group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112974

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marynowski-Traczyk, D., & Broadbent, M. (2011). What are the experiences of Emergency Department nurses in 14(3), 172-179.
  2. Wahlbeck K., Westman J., Nordentoft M., Gissler M., Laursen T.M. (2011). Life expectancy of patients with mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry; 199:453-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perry, A., Lawrence, V., & Henderson, C.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Henderson, Claire
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
255
Pages
112974
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021258398
Cited by
51
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
mental health stigma, stigma theory, currency devaluation, social control, rejection, avoidance, failure to act, structural discrimination, quality of care
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Hospitals, General, Humans, Mental Health, Stereotyping, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review