Cited by 623Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Outcomes of Nordic mental health systems: life expectancy of patients with mental disorders

Open access
Wahlbeck, Kristian, Westman, Jeanette, Nordentoft, Merete, Gissler, Mika, Laursen, Thomas Munk·2011·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: People with mental disorders evince excess mortality due to natural and unnatural deaths. The relative life expectancy of people with mental disorders is a proxy measure of effectiveness of social policy and health service provision. Aims: To evaluate trends in health outcomes of people with serious mental disorders. Method: We examined nationwide 5-year consecutive cohorts of people admitted to hospital for mental disorders in Denmark, Finland and Sweden in 1987–2006. In each country the risk population was identified from hospital discharge registers and mortality data were retrieved from cause-of-death registers. The main outcome measure was life expectancy at age 15 years. Results: People admitted to hospital for a mental disorder had a two- to threefold higher mortality than the general population in all three countries studied. This gap in life expectancy was more pronounced for men than for women. The gap decreased between 1987 and 2006 in these countries, especially for women. The notable exception was Swedish men with mental disorders. In spite of the positive general trend, men with mental disorders still live 20 years less, and women 15 years less, than the general population. Conclusions: During the era of deinstitutionalisation the life expectancy gap for people with mental disorders has somewhat diminished in the three Nordic countries. Our results support further development of the Nordic welfare state model, i.e. tax-funded community-based public services and social protection. Health promotion actions, improved access to healthcare and prevention of suicides and violence are needed to further reduce the life expectancy gap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085100

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hewer W, Ro ¨ssler W. Mortality of patients with functional psychiatric illnesses during in-patient treatment [in German]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1997; 65: 171-81.
  2. Keskima ¨ki I, Aro S. The accuracy of data on diagnoses, procedures and accidents in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Int J Health Serv 1991; 2: 15-21.
  3. Wiesler H. Une me ´thode simple pour la construction de tables de mortalite ´ abre ´ge ´es. Proceedings of the First World Population Conference, Rome, vol. 4. United Nations, 1954.
  4. Halpern D. Social Capital. Polity Press, 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wahlbeck, K., Westman, J., Nordentoft, M., Gissler, M., & Laursen, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Nordic School of Public Health (SE)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Wahlbeck, Kristian
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-12
Volume
199
Issue
6
Pages
453-458
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2105984674
Cited by
623
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 24
FWCI
75.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
Nordisk Ministerråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
life expectancy, mental illness, mortality gap, severe mental illness, deinstitutionalization, welfare state typology, sex differences, suicide prevention, mental health services, Nordic countries, Denmark, Finland, Sweden
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cause of Death, Denmark, Female, Finland, Health Policy, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Institutionalization, Life Expectancy, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Organizational Innovation, Sweden, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sex Distribution, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review