Cited by 756Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Structural Levels of Mental Illness Stigma and Discrimination

Corrigan, P. W., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A. C.·2004·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Most of the models that currently describe processes related to mental illness stigma are based on individual-level psychological paradigms. In this article, using a sociological paradigm, we apply the concepts of structural discrimination to broaden our understanding of stigmatizing processes directed at people with mental illness. Structural, or institutional, discrimination includes the policies of private and governmental institutions that intentionally restrict the opportunities of people with mental illness. It also includes major institutions' policies that are not intended to discriminate but whose consequences nevertheless hinder the options of people with mental illness. After more fully defining intentional and unintentional forms of structural discrimination, we provide current examples of each. Then we discuss the implications of structural models for advancing our understanding of mental illness stigma, including the methodological challenges posed by this paradigm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007096

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging research has highlighted that structural forces not only impede implementation in their own right but also perpetuate and reinforce other barriers such as stigma and deprioritization of mental health care.

    “This need for task-sharing interventions to be more responsive to and resistant against macro-level factors is echoed by emerging research that has highlighted the role that structural forces play in not only impeding implementation in their own right but also perpetuating and reinforcing other barriers (e.g., stigma, deprioritization of mental health care) [97–99].”

    From Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks (2022) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Conclusion says institutional, economic and political forces can give rise to mental illness stigma. The section on unintentional structural discrimination describes policies that leave psychiatric care with fewer resources, and the section on supportive services says those shortages can compound discrimination. The paper does not address implementation of task-sharing interventions, so it does not support that part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Blau, P.M. Structural effects. American Sociological Review, 25:178-193, 1960.
  2. Philo, G. The media and public belief. In: Philo, G., ed. Media and Mental Distress. Essex, England: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd. pp. 82-114.
  3. Satel, S., and Jaffe, D.J. Violent fantasies. National Review (July 20):33-37, 1998.
  4. Shain, R., and Phillips, J. The stigma of mental illness: Labeling and stereotyping in the news. In: Wilkins, L., and Patterson, P., eds. Risky Business: Communicating Issues of Science, Risk, and Public Policy. New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1991. pp. 61-74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corrigan, P. W., Markowitz, F. E., & Watson, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Corrigan, P. W.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
481-491
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2116487032
Cited by
756
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 30
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Huskie Commons (Northern Illinois University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Northern Illinois University
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH062198, MH-62198)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
mental health stigma, structural discrimination
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Prejudice, Social Conditions, Stereotyping, Organizational Policy, Models, Organizational, Private Sector, Federal Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review