Cited by 74LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomelessness and Social Issues

Peer support as a protective factor against suicide in trans populations: A scoping review

Kia, Hannah, MacKinnon, Kinnon Ross, Abramovich, Alex, Bonato, Sarah·2021·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Rationale There is a growing body of research involving transgender (trans) individuals that foregrounds elevated rates of suicidality in trans populations. Although peer support is increasingly studied as a protective factor against suicide among trans persons, the scholarship in this area continues to be limited and has yet to be synthesized and appraised.Objective In this paper, we address this existing gap in the literature by presenting the results of a scoping review of the literature examining the significance and function of peer support in mitigating suicide risk in trans populations.Methods This scoping review is based on an analysis of 34 studies that were included following the execution of a methodical search and selection process. Drawing on scoping review methodology, along with PRISMA-P guidelines, we selected peer-reviewed empirical works, published between 2000 and 2020, which examined relationships between providing, seeking, and/or receiving peer support and suicide risk in trans populations.Results Our findings, which are conceptualized using the minority stress model as a guiding theoretical framework, reveal that while the literature generally substantiates the protective significance of peer support for trans persons, a small body of work also uncovers novel and unanticipated sources of peer support, including social support offered by trans peers online, which are infrequently and inconsistently examined in this body of scholarship.Conclusions Using our appraisal of the literature, we outline the need for future research to further elucidate the significance and function of peer support in protecting against suicide among trans persons. In particular, we discuss the need for exploratory inquiry to inform a conceptualization and operationalization of peer support that more fully and consistently accounts for how such support (including online and community-based support) is sought, received, and experienced among trans persons in the context of suicide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114026

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kia, H., MacKinnon, K. R., Abramovich, A., & Bonato, S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • York University (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Kia, Hannah
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
279
Pages
114026
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162533137
Cited by
74
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
The University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
peer support, suicide risk, transgender people, suicide prevention, minority stress model, online peer support, social support, protective factors
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Social Support, Suicidal Ideation, Transgender Persons, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review