Cited by 280Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exploring young adult consumers’ sustainable clothing consumption intention-behavior gap: A Behavioral Reasoning Theory perspective

Diddi, Sonali, Yan, Ruoh-Nan, Bloodhart, Brittany, Bajtelsmit, Vickie, McShane, Katie·2019·Sustainable Production and Consumption

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Beard, 2008, The branding of ethical fashion and the consumer: a luxury niche or mass-market reality?, Fash. Theory, 12, 447, 10.2752/175174108X346931 · DOI
  2. Bhardwaj, 2010, Fast fashion: response to changes in the fashion industry, Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res., 20, 165
  3. Bly, 2015, Exit from the high street: An exploratory study of sustainable fashion consumption pioneers, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 39, 125, 10.1111/ijcs.12159 · DOI
  4. Bögel, 2016, Company reputation and its influence on consumer trust in response to ongoing CSR communication, J. Mark. Commun., 1
  5. Cervellon, 2011, Consumers’ perceptions of’green’: Why and how consumers use eco-fashion and green beauty products, Crit. Stud. Fash. Beauty, 2, 117, 10.1386/csfb.2.1-2.117_1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chan, 2012, The consumption side of sustainable fashion supply chain: Understanding fashion consumer eco-fashion consumption decision, J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J., 16, 193
  7. Cho, 2015, Style consumption: its drivers and role in sustainable apparel consumption, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 39, 661, 10.1111/ijcs.12185 · DOI
  8. Connell, 2010, Internal and external barriers to eco-conscious apparel acquisition, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 34, 279, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00865.x · DOI
  9. Connell, 2011, Exploring consumers’ perceptions of eco-conscious apparel acquisition behaviors, Soc. Responsib. J., 7, 61, 10.1108/17471111111114549 · DOI
  10. Connell, 2012, Sustainability knowledge and behaviors of apparel and textile undergraduates, Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ., 13, 394, 10.1108/14676371211262335 · DOI
  11. Diddi, 2016, Corporate social responsibility in the retail apparel context: Exploring consumers’ personal and normative influences on patronage intentions, J. Mark. Channels, 23, 60, 10.1080/1046669X.2016.1147892 · DOI
  12. Edbring, 2016, Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers, J. Cleaner Prod., 123, 5, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.107 · DOI
  13. Harris, 2016, Sustainable clothing: challenges, barriers and interventions for encouraging more sustainable consumer behaviour, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 40, 309, 10.1111/ijcs.12257 · DOI
  14. Hill, 2012, Young generation Y consumers’ perceptions of sustainability in the apparel industry, J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J., 16, 477
  15. Hong, 2010, The effect of environmental values of fashion consumers on purchase satisfaction and repurchase intention of eco-friendly fashion products, Fash. Text. Res. J., 12, 431, 10.5805/KSCI.2010.12.4.431 · DOI
  16. Hustvedt, 2009, Consumer likelihood of purchasing organic cotton apparel: Influence of attitudes and self-identity, J. Fash. Mark. Manag.: Int. J., 13, 49
  17. Jackson, 2005, Motivating sustainable consumption, Sustain. Dev. Res. Netw., 29
  18. Jägel, 2012, Individual values and motivational complexities in ethical clothing consumption: A means-end approach, J. Mark. Manag., 28, 373
  19. Joy, 2012, Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands, Fash. Theory, 16, 273, 10.2752/175174112X13340749707123 · DOI
  20. Katz, 1960, The functional approach to the study of attitudes, Public Opin. Quart., 24, 163, 10.1086/266945 · DOI
  21. Kozar, 2010, Socially responsible knowledge and behaviors: Comparing upper-vs. lower-classmen, Coll. Stud. J., 44, 279
  22. Laitala, 2014, Consumers’ clothing disposal behaviour–a synthesis of research results, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 38, 444, 10.1111/ijcs.12088 · DOI
  23. Laitala, 2018, Does use matter? Comparison of environmental impacts of clothing based on fiber type, Sustainability, 10, 2524, 10.3390/su10072524 · DOI
  24. Lang, 2018, Collaborative consumption: The influence of fashion leadership, need for uniqueness, and materialism on female consumers’ adoption of clothing renting and swapping, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 13, 37, 10.1016/j.spc.2017.11.005 · DOI
  25. Lee, 2012, Does green fashion retailing make consumers more eco-friendly? The influence of green fashion products and campaigns on green consciousness and behavior, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 30, 67, 10.1177/0887302X12446065 · DOI
  26. Lundblad, 2016, The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption, J. Consum. Behav., 15, 149, 10.1002/cb.1559 · DOI
  27. McNeill, 2015, Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 39, 212, 10.1111/ijcs.12169 · DOI
  28. Moisander, 2007, Motivational complexity of green consumerism, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 31, 404, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00586.x · DOI
  29. Morgan, 2009, An investigation of young fashion consumers’ disposal habits, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 33, 190, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00756.x · DOI
  30. Niinimäki, 2010, Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology, Sustain. Dev., 18, 150, 10.1002/sd.455 · DOI
  31. Norum, 2013, Examination of apparel maintenance skills and practices: Implications for sustainable clothing consumption, Family Consum. Sci. Res. J., 42, 124, 10.1111/fcsr.12047 · DOI
  32. Park, 2015, The influence of consumption values on fast fashion brand purchases, Res. J. Costume Culture, 23, 468, 10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.3.468 · DOI
  33. Park, 2017, Use of behavioral reasoning theory to examine the role of social responsibility in attitudes toward apparel donation, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 41, 333, 10.1111/ijcs.12347 · DOI
  34. Pennington, 1993, Reasoning in explanation-based decision making, Cognition, 49, 123, 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-W · DOI
  35. Pookulangara, 2013, Slow fashion movement: Understanding consumer perceptions—An exploratory study, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 20, 200, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.002 · DOI
  36. Preuit, 2017, Fashion and sustainability: Increasing knowledge about slow fashion through an educational module, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., 12, 1139
  37. Robbins, 1994, Environmental attitudes conceptualized through developmental theory: A qualitative analysis, J. Soc. Issues, 50, 29, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02418.x · DOI
  38. Ruppert-Stroescu, 2015, Creativity and sustainable fashion apparel consumption: the fashion detox, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 33, 167, 10.1177/0887302X15579990 · DOI
  39. Thomas, 2008, From green blur to ecofashion: Fashioning an eco-lexicon, Fash. Theory, 12, 525, 10.2752/175174108X346977 · DOI
  40. Westaby, 2005, Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 98, 97, 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003 · DOI
  41. Westaby, 1996, Factors underlying behavioral choice: Testing a new reasons theory approach 1, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 26, 1307, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00072.x · DOI
  42. Yan, 2012, Marketing eco-fashion: The influence of brand name and message explicitness, J. Mark. Commun., 18, 151, 10.1080/13527266.2010.490420 · DOI
  43. Zhou, 2013, The moderating role of human values in planned behavior: the case of chinese consumers’ intention to buy organic food, J. Consum. Mark., 30, 335, 10.1108/JCM-02-2013-0482 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–238 of 238

Metadata

Authors
Diddi, S., Yan, R.-N., Bloodhart, B., Bajtelsmit, V., & McShane, K.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Diddi, Sonali
Venue
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
18
Pages
200-209
ISSN
2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917255899
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
FWCI
26.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sustainable Production and Consumption (publishedVersion)
Funders
School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
sustainable clothing consumption, young adult consumers, intention-behavior gap, behavioral reasoning theory, textile waste, sustainability commitments, perceived value, circular fashion, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review