Cited by 13Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

Experience of primary healthcare workers in using the mobile app-based WHO mhGAP intervention guide in detection and treatment of people with mental disorders: A qualitative study in Nepal

Open access
Luitel, Nagendra P., Neupane, Vibha, Lamichhane, Bishnu, Koirala, Gobinda Prasad, Gautam, Kamal, Karki, Eliza, Adhikari, Sandarba, Votruba, Nicole +5 more·2023·SSM - Mental Health

Abstract

This study assessed perception and experience of trained primary health care workers in using a mobile app-based version of the WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide in the assessment and management of people with mental health conditions in primary care in Nepal. A qualitative study was conducted with primary healthcare workers who were trained in using the WHO mhGAP mobile application in Jhapa, a district in eastern Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 15 healthcare workers (3 females and 12 males) nine months after the training. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English for the thematic qualitative data analysis. Health care workers (HCWs) found the mobile app helpful to verify and confirm their assessment and diagnosis. The other benefits reported by the participants were: bringing uniformity in diagnosis and management of mental health conditions across primary healthcare facilities; reminding the HCWs specific assessment questions; creating awareness on the importance of psychosocial intervention; improving the interaction between patients and service providers; and the importance of follow-up care. Despite these advantages, lack of clarity about report submission modality; lack of electricity or internet connectivity; and low technology literacy among older HCWs were some of the barriers in using the app. The major recommendation made by the HCWs for the guide included revision of the assessment process and system; inclusion of a chat function with supervisors; minimizing the amount of patients' data to be collected in the app; and addition of conversion and anxiety disorders to the app. This study concludes that the mobile decision support application could be acceptable and feasible in primary care settings if the suggested modifications are incorporated, in addition to addressing other systemic issues facing the primary care-based delivery of mental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100278

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. WHO mhGAP: Mental Health Gap Action Programme: Scaling up Care for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders 2008 World Health Organization Geneva 26290926
  2. WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) – Version 1.0 2010 WHO Geneva, Swizerland 23741783
  3. WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-specialized Health Settings: Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) – Version 2.0 2016 World Health Organization Geneva 27786430
  4. WHO mhGAP Intervention Guide - Version 2.0 - for Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Disorders in Non-specialized Health Settings 2019 World Health Organization Geneva 27786430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luitel, N. P., Neupane, V., Lamichhane, B., Koirala, G. P., Gautam, K., Karki, E., Adhikari, S., Votruba, N., Jordans, M. J., Kohrt, B. A., Carswell, K., Thornicroft, G., & Lempp, H.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Luitel, Nagendra P.
Venue
SSM - Mental Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
4
Pages
100278
ISSN
2666-5603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389152071
Cited by
13
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSM - Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U19MH113211)
  • National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South London
  • Wellcome Trust
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • UK Research and Innovation (MR/R023697/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/S001255/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
mobile application, primary health care workers, primary care mental health, mobile decision support, technology acceptance, barriers to app use, internet access, technological literacy, psychosocial interventions, follow-up care, mental health service delivery, Nepal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review