Cited by 76Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Effects of school organizational conditions on teacher professional learning in China: the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy

Huang, Liang, Zhang, Ting, Huang, Yating·2020·Studies in Educational Evaluation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100893

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, L., Zhang, T., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Yating
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
66
Pages
100893
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3031197831
Cited by
76
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
teacher learning, teacher self-efficacy, learning-centered leadership, learning opportunities, cultural barriers, mediating effect, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review