Cited by 7Educational Innovations and ChallengesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Factors influencing teaching innovation at a university: an extension of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model in the digital age

Huang, Yifan, Huang, Biyang, Yang, Zi·2026·Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10734-025-01529-6

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y., Huang, B., & Yang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Zi
Venue
Higher Education
Published
2025-08-30
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
169-187
ISSN
  • 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-174X
OpenAlex
W4413851202
Cited by
7
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Social Science Fund of China (CIA230316)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
educational innovation, job demands-resources model, electronic resources, teacher self-efficacy, university faculty, digitalization of education, moderated mediation, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review