CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effectiveness of post-reading word-focused activities and their associations with working memory

Yang, Yingli, Shintani, Natsuko, Li, Shaofeng, Zhang, Yingyi·2017·System
DOI 10.1016/j.system.2017.09.012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2017.09.012

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of significant delayed differences may be because repeated encounters and contextual evaluation in the gap-filling task helped long-term memory of target words.

    “이처럼 빈칸 채우기 활동에서 목표 어휘를 반복적으로 마주치고 맥락에 대해 평가하게 한 것이 목표 어휘를 장기적으로 기억하는 데 도움을 주었고(cf.Yang et al., 2017), 이로 인해 결국 세 집단 간 장기 학습 효과에 있어 도드라진 차이가 목격되지 않았을 것이라 추론된다.”

    From Effects of Task-Induced Involvement Load and Working Memory on Korean High School Students’ Second Language Vocabulary Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Alptekin, 2009, Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference?, System, 37, 627, 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.007 · DOI
  2. Andersson, 2010, The contribution of working memory capacity to foreign language comprehension in children, Memory, 18, 458, 10.1080/09658211003762084 · DOI
  3. Bergsleithner, 2010, Working memory capacity and L2 writing performance, Ciências & Cognição, 15, 2
  4. Cheung, 1996, Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning, Developmental Psychology, 32, 867, 10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.867 · DOI
  5. Craik, 1972, Levels of processing: A framework for memory research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671, 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X · DOI · Paper page
  6. Daneman, 1980, Individual differences in working memory and reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450, 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Daneman, 1996, Working memory and language comprehension: A meta- analysis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422, 10.3758/BF03214546 · DOI
  8. Engel, 2012, Executive and phonological processes in second- language acquisition, Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 974, 10.1037/a0028390 · DOI
  9. Erlam, 2005, Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition, Language Teaching Research, 9, 147, 10.1191/1362168805lr161oa · DOI · Paper page
  10. File, 2010, Should vocabulary instruction be integrated or isolated?, TESOL Quarterly, 44, 222, 10.5054/tq.2010.219943 · DOI
  11. Harrington, 1992, L2 Working memory capacity and L2 reading skill, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25, 10.1017/S0272263100010457 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Henriksen, 1999, Three dimensions of vocabulary development, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303, 10.1017/S0272263199002089 · DOI
  13. Huang, 2012, The effects of task involvement load on L2 incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analytic study, The Modern Language Journal, 96, 544, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01394.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hummel, 2009, Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners, Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 225, 10.1017/S0142716409090109 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kempe, 2010, Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories, Language Learning, 60, 127, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00553.x · DOI
  16. Kim, 2011, The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition, Language Learning, 61, 100, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00644.x · DOI
  17. Laufer, 2003, Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence, The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 567, 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Laufer, 2009, Second language vocabulary acquisition from language input and from form- focused activities, Language Teaching, 42, 341, 10.1017/S0261444809005771 · DOI
  19. Li, 2013, The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory, The Modern Language Journal, 97, 634, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x · DOI
  20. Linck, 2014, Working memory and second language comprehension and production, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861, 10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 · DOI
  21. Mackey, 2010, Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity, Language Learning, 60, 501, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00565.x · DOI
  22. Martin, 2012, The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 179, 10.1017/S0272263112000125 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Masoura, 2005, Contrasting contributions of phonological short-term memory and long-term knowledge to vocabulary learning in a foreign language, Memory, 13, 422, 10.1080/09658210344000323 · DOI
  24. Paribakht, 1993, Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program, TESL Canada Journal, 11, 9, 10.18806/tesl.v11i1.623 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schmitt, 2008, Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning, Language Teaching Research, 12, 329, 10.1177/1362168808089921 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Shintani, 2015, The effectiveness of processing instruction and production-based instruction on L2 grammar acquisition, Applied Linguistics, 36, 306, 10.1093/applin/amu067 · DOI
  27. Spada, 2008, Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?, TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181, 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. Zhao, 2017, Calibrating the CEFR against the China standards of english for college english vocabulary education in China, Language Testing in Asia, 7, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Y., Shintani, N., Li, S., & Zhang, Y.
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
70
Pages
38-49
ISSN
0346-251X
DOI
10.1016/j.system.2017.09.012
Cited by
31
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • China National Natural Science Foundation (31400896)
  • Young Excellent Talents (17YQ09)
  • UIBE
  • China Scholarship Council (201506645016)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review