CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE ROLES OF PHONOLOGICAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND WORKING MEMORY IN L2 GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY LEARNING

Martin, Katherine I., Ellis, Nick C.·2012·Studies in Second Language Acquisition
DOI 10.1017/s0272263112000125
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study analyzed phonological short-term memory (PSTM) and working memory (WM) and their relationship with vocabulary and grammar learning in an artificial foreign language. Nonword repetition, nonword recognition, and listening span were used as memory measures. Participants learned the singular forms of vocabulary for an artificial foreign language before being exposed to plural forms in sentence contexts. Participants were tested on their ability to induce the grammatical forms and to generalize the forms to novel utterances. Individual differences in final abilities in vocabulary and grammar correlated between 0.44 and 0.76, depending on the measure. Despite these strong associations, the results demonstrated significant independent effects of PSTM and WM on L2 vocabulary learning and on L2 grammar learning, some of which were mediated by vocabulary and some of which were direct effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263112000125

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phonological short-term memory is most relevant for the acquisition and development of vocabulary, formulaic sequences and grammar.

    “phonological shortterm memory has been shown to be most relevant for the acquisition and development of vocabulary, formulaic sequences and grammar”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Martin & Ellis 2012

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1080/02724980042000002 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.012611199 · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0142716408080211 · DOI
  4. Fortkamp, 1999, Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production, Communication and Cognition, 32, 259
  5. 10.1075/arcl.7.05ell · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.367 · DOI
  7. French, 2006, Phonological working memory and second language acquisition: A developmental study of Francophone children learning English in Quebec
  8. 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/089) · DOI
  9. Collins, 2009, Input and second language construction learning: Frequency, form, and function [Special issue], Modern Language Journal, 93, 329, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x · DOI
  10. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/jmla.1993.1005 · DOI
  12. Bates, 1997, On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507, 10.1080/016909697386628 · DOI
  13. Schneider, 2002, E-Prime reference guide
  14. Chomsky, 1957, Syntactic structures, 10.1515/9783112316009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05410.x · DOI
  16. Adams, 2000, Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development, International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 95, 10.1080/136828200247278 · DOI
  17. Arbuckle, 2006, Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer software]
  18. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00638.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Polomé, 1967, Swahili language handbook
  20. Pawley, 1983, Language and communication, 191
  21. 10.1017/S0272263106060153 · DOI
  22. Ellis, 2008, Phraseology in language learning and teaching, 1
  23. 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1017/S0142716408090048 · DOI
  25. Williams, 2012, The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition
  26. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90028-9 · DOI
  27. Robinson, 2008, Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 10.4324/9780203938560 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/713755604 · DOI
  29. Goldberg, 1995, Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure
  30. 10.1080/713755610 · DOI
  31. Paradis, 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 393
  32. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1080/03640210802073689 · DOI
  35. Katz, 1964, An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions
  36. King, 2003, Modern Welsh: A comprehensive grammar, 10.4324/9780203987063 · DOI
  37. 10.1017/S1366728908003416 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x · DOI
  39. 10.1075/lllt.2.12mac · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S0305000900009302 · DOI
  41. Baddeley, 1974, Recent advances in learning and motivation, 8, 47
  42. 10.1080/002075999399738 · DOI
  43. Haywood, 1965, A new Arabic grammar of the written language
  44. O’Brien, 2006, Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners, Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377, 10.1017/S0142716406060322 · DOI
  45. O’Brien, 2007, Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557
  46. 10.1017/S1366728901000220 · DOI
  47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2220-04.2004 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90040-Q · DOI
  49. 10.1126/science.1857983 · DOI
  50. 10.1207/S15326942DN231&2_2 · DOI
  51. 10.1075/lllt.2 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1075/arcl.7.06rom · DOI
  54. 10.1080/14640749208401314 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/S0142716400007062 · DOI
  56. Ullman, 2005, Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice, 141
  57. Sinclair, 1991, Corpus, concordance, collocation
  58. Sinclair, 2004, Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse, 10.4324/9780203594070 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/014272379301303705 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/713755823 · DOI
  61. 10.3758/BF03196173 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1111/1467-9922.00211 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1111/1540-4781.00187 · DOI
  65. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1027/1016-9040.11.4.289 · DOI
  67. Gathercole, 1993, Working memory and language
  68. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Baddeley, 1998, Working memory, C.R. Académie des sciences Paris, Sciences de la Vie / Life Sciences, 321, 167
  70. 10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4 · DOI
  71. 10.1017/S0272263100010457 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C.
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2012-08-15
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
379-413
ISSN
  • 0272-2631
  • 1470-1545
DOI
10.1017/s0272263112000125
Cited by
181
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review