Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using video to promote early childhood teachers' thinking and reflection

Cherrington, Sue, Loveridge, Judith·2014·Teaching and Teacher Education
DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Anderson, 2009, The evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition, Research in Science Education, 39, 181, 10.1007/s11165-007-9078-1 · DOI
  2. Bayat, 2010, Use of dialogue journals and video-recording in early childhood teacher education, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31, 159, 10.1080/10901021003781247 · DOI
  3. Borko, 2008, Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Borko, 2011, Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs, ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 175, 10.1007/s11858-010-0302-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Calderhead, 1981, Stimulated recall: a method for research on teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02474.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Collin, 2011, The collective dimension of reflective practice: the how and why, Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 12, 569, 10.1080/14623943.2011.590346 · DOI
  7. Davis, 2006, Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: seeing what matters, Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281, 10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Education Review Office, 2009
  9. van Es, 2012, Examining the development of a teacher learning community: the case of a video club, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 182, 10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005 · DOI
  10. van Es, 2008, Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ethell, 2000, Unlocking the knowledge in action of an expert practitioner, Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 87, 10.1177/002248710005100203 · DOI
  12. Gass, 2001, Innovation in second language research methods, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 221, 10.1017/S0267190501000137 · DOI
  13. Goodwin, 1994, Professional vision, American Anthropologist, 96, 606, 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Grey, 2011, Professional dialogue as professional learning, New Zealand Journal of Teachers' Work, 8, 21, 10.24135/teacherswork.v8i1.543 · doi:10.24135/teacherswork.v8i1.543
  15. Hennessy, 2009, “Intermediate theory” building”: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies, Teachers College Record, 111, 1753, 10.1177/016146810911100701 · DOI
  16. Kugelmass, 2000, Explicit and implicit dimensions of adult–child interactions in a quality childcare center, Early Childhood Education Journal, 28, 19, 10.1023/A:1009591319113 · DOI
  17. Lyle, 2003, Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research, British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861, 10.1080/0141192032000137349 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marland, 1990, Classroom theory, thinking, and action, Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 93, 10.1016/0742-051X(90)90010-3 · DOI
  19. Mena Marcos, 2006, Studying studies on teacher reflection and action: an appraisal of research contributions, Educational Research Review, 1, 112, 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.003 · DOI
  20. Mitchell, 2003, Shifts in thinking through a teachers' network, Early Childhood Folio, 7, 22, 10.18296/ecf.0235 · doi:10.18296/ecf.0235
  21. Mitchell, 1989, Research on teacher thinking: the next phase, Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 115, 10.1016/0742-051X(89)90010-3 · DOI
  22. Moyles, 2002, Using reflective dialogues as a tool for engaging with challenges of defining effective pedagogy, Early Childhood Development and Care, 172, 463, 10.1080/03004430214551 · doi:10.1080/03004430214551
  23. Rosaen, 2008, Noticing noticing: how does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences?, Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 347, 10.1177/0022487108322128 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Santagata, 2011, Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching, ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 133, 10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schepens, 2007, Studying learning processes of student teachers with stimulated recall interviews through changes in interactive cognitions, Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 457, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.014 · DOI
  26. Sherin, 2004, Teacher learning in the context of a video club, Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163, 10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Sherin, 2009, Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20, 10.1177/0022487108328155 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Stephen, 2010, Pedagogy: the silent partner in early years learning, Early Years, 30, 15, 10.1080/09575140903402881 · DOI
  29. Stoll, 2006, Professional learning communities: a review of the literature, Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221, 10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Timperley, 2001, Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers' schema, Journal of Educational Change, 2, 281, 10.1023/A:1014646624263 · DOI
  31. Tripp, 2012, The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 728, 10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wood, 2000, Changing theories, changing practice: exploring early childhood teachers' professional learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 635, 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00011-1 · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00011-1
  33. Yinger, 1986, Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 263, 10.1016/S0742-051X(86)80007-5 · DOI
  34. Yost, 2000, An examination of the construct of critical reflection: implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century, Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 39, 10.1177/002248710005100105 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Zhang, 2011, Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 454, 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.015 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cherrington, S., & Loveridge, J.
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
41
Pages
42-51
ISSN
0742-051X
DOI
10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.004
Cited by
74
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.