Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue

Vergragt, Philip J., Quist, Jaco·2011·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Linstone, 1969, When is a need a need? The problem of normative forecasting in a changing environment, Technological Forecasting, 1, 55, 10.1016/0099-3964(69)90006-4 · doi:10.1016/0099-3964(69)90006-4
  2. Lonnroth, 1980, Sweden beyond oil: nuclear commitments and solar options, Science, 208, 557, 10.1126/science.208.4444.557 · doi:10.1126/science.208.4444.557
  3. Vergragt, 1993, Sustainable technological development: the making of a Dutch long-term oriented technology programme, Project Appraisal, 8, 134, 10.1080/02688867.1993.9726902 · doi:10.1080/02688867.1993.9726902
  4. Holmberg, 1998, Backcasting: a natural step in operationalising sustainable development, Greener Management International, 23, 30
  5. Quist, 2001, Strategies towards sustainable households using stakeholder workshops and scenarios, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4, 75, 10.1504/IJSD.2001.001547 · doi:10.1504/ijsd.2001.001547
  6. Van de Kerkhof, 2002, Shaping diversity in participatory foresight studies: experiences with interactive backcasting in a stakeholder assessment on long-term climate policy in the Netherlands, Greener Management International, 85, 10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.sp.00008 · doi:10.9774/gleaf.3062.2002.sp.00008
  7. Partidario, 2002, Planning of strategic innovation aimed at environmental sustainability: actor-networks, scenario acceptance and backcasting analysis within a polymeric coating chain, Futures, 34, 841, 10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00030-7 · doi:10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00030-7
  8. Schmidt-Bleek, 2008, Factor 10: the future of stuff, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 4, 1
  9. Wack, 1985, Scenarios, shooting the rapids, Harvard Business Review, 131
  10. Ascher, 1979, Problems of forecasting and technology assessment, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13, 149, 10.1016/0040-1625(79)90109-4 · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(79)90109-4
  11. Eames, 2011, Community foresight for urban sustainability: insights from the Citizens Science for Sustainability (SuScit) project, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 769, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.002 · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.002
  12. Svenfelt, 2011, Decreasing energy use in buildings by 50% by 2050—a backcasting study using stakeholder groups, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 785, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.005 · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.005
  13. Gomi, 2011, A systematic quantitative backcasting on low-carbon society policy in case of Kyoto City, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 852, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.002 · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.002
  14. Anderson, 2001, Reconciling the electricity industry with sustainable development: backcasting—a strategic alternative, Futures, 33, 607, 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00004-0 · doi:10.1016/s0016-3287(01)00004-0
  15. Banister, 2009, Techno-optimism: progress towards CO2 reduction targets in transport: a UK and London perspective, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 12, 24, 10.1504/IJSD.2009.027527 · doi:10.1504/ijsd.2009.027527

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Vergragt, P. J., & Quist, J.
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
747-755
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
OpenAlex
W2032701958
Cited by
326
References
49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.