Cited by 130Smart Cities and TechnologiesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentUrban Planning and Governance

Classifying pathways for smart city development: comparing design, governance and implementation in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi

Open access
Noori, Negar, Hoppe, Thomas, de Jong, Martin·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) as the new paradigm of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and rapid changes in technology and urban needs urge cities around the world towards formulating smart city policies. Nevertheless, policy makers, city planners, and practitioners appear to have quite different expectations from what smart cities can offer them. This has led to the emergence of different types of smart cities and pathways of development. This paper aims to answer the research question: When comparing a selection of smart city projects, can we classify pathways for their implementation? We do this by using a cross-case research design of four cities to explore commonalities and differences in development patterns. An input-output (IO) model of smart city development is used to retrieve which design variables are at play and lead to which output. The four cases pertain to the following smart city projects: Smart Dubai, Masdar City, Barcelona Smart City, and Amsterdam Smart City. Our analysis shows that Amsterdam is based on a business-driven approach that puts innovation at its core; for Masdar, technological optimism is the main essence of the pathway; social inclusion is the focus of Barcelona Smart City; and visionary ambitious leadership is the main driver for Smart Dubai. Based on these insights, a classification for smart city development pathways is established. The results of the present study are useful to academic researchers, smart city practitioners, and policy makers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12104030

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Input-Output Modelling for Smart City Development. J. Urban Technol 2020, Author Omitted for Review in press.
  2. Fistola, R.; La Rocca, R.A. Smart City Planning: A Systemic Approach. In Proceedings of the 6th Knowledge Cities World Summit, Istanbul, Turkey, 9-13 September 2013; pp. 520-530.
  3. Bayar, D.Y. Smart Citizens: Smart cities from a different point of view. In Proceedings of the Inspire Conference.
  4. Hemet, D., Townsend, A., Eds.; FutureEverything: Manchester, UK, 2013; pp. 55-58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noori, N., Hoppe, T., & de Jong, M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Erasmus School of Law and Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Hoppe, Thomas
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-14
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
4030
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024439515
Cited by
130
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
Keywords
smart city development, smart city governance, smart city design, smart city policy, Internet of Things, input-output model, technological optimism, social inclusion, visionary leadership, Masdar City, cross-city comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review