The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects
Open accessAbstract
In the last decade, the Internet of Things (IoT) has affected the approach of organizations to innovation and how they create and capture value in everyday business activities. This is compounded in the so-called Smart Cities, where the objective of the IoT is to exploit information and communication technologies (ICTs) to support added-value services for citizens, giving companies more opportunities to innovate through the use of the latest technologies. In this context, multinational enterprises (MNEs) are building alliances, starting several projects with public and private city stakeholders aimed at exploring new technologies for cities but also at exploiting new IoT-based devices and services in order to profit from them. This implies that companies need to manage and integrate different types of knowledge to efficiently and effectively support the simultaneous pressure of exploration and exploitation, at a project portfolio level. Using structural equations modeling with data collected from 43 IoT smart city project alliances in Italy, this paper tests and finds evidence that MNEs need to develop knowledge management (KM) capabilities combined with ICT capabilities if they want to obtain greater ambidexterity performance at the project portfolio level. More specifically, we highlight that KM capabilities enhance alliance ambidexterity indirectly through firms' ICT capabilities, suggesting that MNE managers should design KM tools and develop new ICT skills. Implications for academics, managers and future lines of research are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00115-6 · Cited by 4,135
Will the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?
Hollands, R. G. (2008) · City · doi:10.1080/13604810802479126 · Cited by 3,025
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
Cited by
Big data analytics capabilities and knowledge management: Impact on firm performance
Ferraris, A., Mazzoleni, A., Devalle, A., & Couturier, J. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2018-0825 · Cited by 673
Self-citationUnveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance
Usai, A., Fiano, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Paoloni, P., Farina Briamonte, M., & Orlando, B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.035 · Cited by 553
Feliciano-Cestero, M. M., Ameen, N., Kotabe, M., Paul, J., & Signoret, M. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113546 · Cited by 438
Big data analytics capabilities and performance: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model
Rialti, R., Zollo, L., Ferraris, A., & Alon, I. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119781 · Cited by 420
Self-citationSantoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Papa, A. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.003 · Cited by 363
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., & Del Giudice, M.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 331-338
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593952285
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 71.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.