CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America

Martin, Chris J., Evans, James, Karvonen, Andrew·2018·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Allwinkle, 2011, Creating smart-er cities: an Overview, J. Urban Technol., 18, 1, 10.1080/10630732.2011.601103 · DOI
  2. Arribas-Bel, 2015, Cyber Cities: Social Media as a Tool for Understanding Cities, Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy, 8, 231, 10.1007/s12061-015-9154-2 · DOI
  3. Bakici, 2013, A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona, J. Knowl. Econ., 4, 135, 10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bates, 2013, The domestication of open government data advocacy in the United Kingdom: a Neo-gramscian analysis, Pol. Internet, 5, 118, 10.1002/poi3.25 · DOI
  5. Ben Letaifa, 2015, How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model, J. Bus. Res., 68, 1414, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.024 · DOI
  6. Bulkeley, 2016, Making a smart city for the smart grid? The urban material politics of actualising smart electricity networks, Environ. Plan. A, 48, 1709, 10.1177/0308518X16648152 · DOI
  7. Campbell, 1996, Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development, J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 62, 296, 10.1080/01944369608975696 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Caragliu, 2012, Smartness and European urban performance: assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes, Innovation, 25, 97
  9. Couclelis, 2004, The construction of the digital city, Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des., 31, 5, 10.1068/b1299 · DOI
  10. Crivello, 2014, Urban policy mobilities: The case of Turin as a smart city, Eur. Plan. Stud., 23, 909, 10.1080/09654313.2014.891568 · DOI
  11. de Jong, 2015, Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization, J. Clean. Prod., 109, 25, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004 · DOI
  12. de Wijs, 2016, How smart is smart? Theoretical and empirical considerations on implementing smart city objectives – a case study of Dutch railway station areas, Innovation, 1610, 1
  13. Gabrys, 2014, Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city, Environ. Plan. D Soc. Sp., 32, 30, 10.1068/d16812 · DOI
  14. Gaffney, 2016, Smarter than smart: Rio de Janeiro's flawed emergence as a smart city, J. Urban Technol., 732, 1
  15. Garau, 2014, Smart paths for advanced management of cultural heritage, Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci., 1, 286
  16. Glasmeier, 2015, Thinking about smart cities, Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 3, 10.1093/cjres/rsu034 · DOI
  17. Grimaldi, 2015, The alignment of University curricula with the building of a Smart City: A case study from Barcelona, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 123, 298, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.011 · DOI
  18. Haarstad, 2016, Constructing the sustainable city: examining the role of sustainability in the “smart city” discourse, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 19, 423, 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1245610 · DOI
  19. Hargreaves, 2013, Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term, Energy Policy, 52, 126, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.027 · DOI
  20. Harvey, 2014, Giving and sharing in the computer-mediated economy, J. Consum. Behav.
  21. Hepworth, 1990, Planning for the information city: the challenge and response, Urban Stud., 27, 537, 10.1080/00420989020080501 · DOI
  22. Hielkema, 2013, Developing the Helsinki Smart City: The Role of Competitions for Open Data Applications, J. Knowl. Econ., 4, 190, 10.1007/s13132-012-0087-6 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Holden, 2014, Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited, Glob. Environ. Chang., 26, 130, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006 · DOI
  24. Hollands, 2008, Will the real smart city please stand up?, City, 12, 303, 10.1080/13604810802479126 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hollands, 2014, Critical interventions into the corporate smart city, Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 61, 10.1093/cjres/rsu011 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hornborg, 2009, Zero-sum world: Challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system, Int. J. Comp. Sociol., 50, 237, 10.1177/0020715209105141 · DOI
  27. Janicke, 2012, “Green growth”: From a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability, Energy Policy, 48, 13, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045 · DOI
  28. Joss, 2013, Towards the “ubiquitous eco-city”: An analysis of the internationalisation of eco-city policy and practice, Urban Res. Pract., 6, 54, 10.1080/17535069.2012.762216 · DOI
  29. Karvonen, 2013, Towards systemic domestic retrofit: a social practices approach, Build. Res. Inf., 41, 563, 10.1080/09613218.2013.805298 · DOI
  30. Kim, 2016, Impact of the Smart City industry on the Korean national economy: input–output analysis, Sustainability, 8, 649, 10.3390/su8070649 · DOI
  31. Kitchin, 2014, Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings, Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 131, 10.1093/cjres/rsu027 · DOI
  32. Kitchin, 2015, The Praxis and Politics of Building Urban Dashboards, Geoforum, 77, 1
  33. Kitson, 2004, Regional competitiveness: an elusive yet key concept?, Reg. Stud., 38, 991, 10.1080/0034340042000320816 · DOI
  34. Komninos, 2013, Toward intelligent Thessaloniki: from an agglomeration of apps to smart districts, J. Knowl. Econ., 4, 149, 10.1007/s13132-012-0085-8 · DOI
  35. Kostakis, 2016, Towards a political ecology of the digital economy: Socio-environmental implications of two competing value models, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 18, 82, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.002 · DOI
  36. Kraus, 2015, Innovating and exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities in smart cities: evidence from Germany, Creat. Innov. Manag., 24, 601, 10.1111/caim.12154 · DOI
  37. Lee, 2014, Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 89, 80, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033 · DOI
  38. Lovell, 2016, Are policy failures mobile? An investigation of the advanced metering infrastructure program in the State of Victoria, Australia, Environ. Plan. A, 49, 314, 10.1177/0308518X16668170 · DOI
  39. Mahizhnan, 1999, Smart cities, Cities, 16, 13, 10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00050-X · DOI
  40. Maier, 2016, Smart energy systems for smart city districts: case study Reininghaus District, Energy. Sustain. Soc., 6, 23, 10.1186/s13705-016-0085-9 · DOI
  41. March, 2016, The Smart City and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: any room for dialogue with degrowth?, J. Clean. Prod.
  42. March, 2014, Smart contradictions: the politics of making Barcelona a Self-sufficient city, Eur. Urban Reg. Stud., 1
  43. Marciano, 2013, Unpacking a Smart City Model, Int. J. Interdiscip. Environ. Stud., 8, 1
  44. Martin, 2016, The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?, Ecol. Econ., 121, 149, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Martin, 2017, Democratising platform governance in the sharing economy: An analytical framework and initial empirical insights, J. Clean. Prod., 166, 1395, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.123 · DOI
  46. McArthur, 2014, Many-to-many exchange without money: why people share their resources, Consum. Mark. Cult., 18, 239, 10.1080/10253866.2014.987083 · DOI
  47. McLean, 2015, Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio-technical experimentation in the city of Austin, Urban Stud., 53, 3246, 10.1177/0042098015612984 · DOI
  48. McMeekin, 2012, Sustainability transitions and final consumption: practices and socio-technical systems, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 24, 345, 10.1080/09537325.2012.663960 · DOI
  49. Mcneill, 2016, Governing a city of unicorns: technology capital and the urban politics of San Francisco, Urban Geogr., 37, 494, 10.1080/02723638.2016.1139868 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Nam, 2014, The changing face of a city government: a case study of Philly311, Gov. Inf. Q., 31, S1, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.002 · DOI
  51. Paroutis, 2013, A strategic view on smart city technology: the case of IBM Smarter Cities during a recession, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 89, 262, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041 · DOI
  52. Perng, 2016, Solutions and frictions in civic hacking: collaboratively designing and building wait time predictions for an immigration office, Soc. Cult. Geogr., 9365, 1
  53. Pincetl, 2005, The Reinvention of Public Green Space, Urban Geogr., 26, 365, 10.2747/0272-3638.26.5.365 · DOI
  54. Pollio, 2016, Technologies of austerity urbanism: the “smart city” agenda in Italy (2011–2013), Urban Geogr., 1
  55. Pullinger, 2014, Influencing household energy practices: a critical review of UK smart metering standards and commercial feedback devices, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 26, 1144, 10.1080/09537325.2014.977245 · DOI
  56. Russo, 2016, European plans for the smart city: from theories and rules to logistics test case, Eur. Plan. Stud., 1–18
  57. Schuurman, 2012, Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., 7, 49, 10.4067/S0718-18762012000300006 · DOI
  58. Shelton, 2015, The “actually existing smart city”, Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 13, 10.1093/cjres/rsu026 · DOI
  59. Söderström, 2014, Smart cities as corporate storytelling, City, 18, 307, 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716 · DOI
  60. Sorrell, 2009, Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: a review, Energy Policy, 37, 1356, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.026 · DOI
  61. Steffen, 2015, Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet, Science, 347, 736, 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Taylor Buck, 2017, Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative, Urban Stud., 54, 501, 10.1177/0042098015597162 · DOI
  63. Tranos, 2012, Smart networked cities?, Innovation, 25, 175
  64. van der Graaf, 2014, Designing for participatory governance: assessing capabilities and toolkits in public service delivery, Info, 16, 74, 10.1108/info-07-2014-0028 · DOI
  65. Vanolo, 2016, Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow's smart cities, Futures, 82, 26, 10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.010 · DOI
  66. Viitanen, 2014, Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector, Environ. Plan. A, 46, 803, 10.1068/a46242 · DOI
  67. Voytenko, 2015, Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda, J. Clean. Prod., 123, 45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053 · DOI
  68. Wiig, 2015, IBM's smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility, City, 19, 258, 10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275 · DOI
  69. Wiig, 2016, The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia, Urban Geogr., 37, 535, 10.1080/02723638.2015.1065686 · DOI
  70. Yigitcanlar, 2014, Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 89, 100, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034 · DOI
  71. Zubizarreta, 2016, Smart City concept: what it is and what it should be, J. Urban Plann. Dev., 142, 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000282 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martin, C. J., Evans, J., & Karvonen, A.
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
133
Pages
269-278
ISSN
0040-1625
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
Cited by
383
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review