Cited by 81Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingBusiness Strategies and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge Management

Contextual factors of disruptive innovation: A systematic review and framework

Antonio, Jerome L., Kanbach, Dominik K.·2023·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122274

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonio, J. L., & Kanbach, D. K.
Affiliations
HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management (DE)
Corresponding author
Antonio, Jerome L.
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
188
Pages
122274
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313367084
Cited by
74
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
disruptive innovation, contextual factors, market structure, organizational culture, regulation, demand, social change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review