Cited by 410Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity

Govindarajan, Vijay, Kopalle, Praveen K.·2006·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

Strategic management scholars have long explored the broad topic of innovation, a cornerstone in creating competitive advantage. Any attempt at theory construction in this area must encompass reliable and valid measures for key innovation characteristics. Yet, with respect to an important construct, i.e., disruptiveness of innovations, there has been relatively little academic research. Without formalizing the disruptiveness concept with a reliable and valid measure, it is difficult to conduct rigorous research to uncover the causes of the innovator's dilemma and identify mechanisms to help incumbents develop such innovations. In this paper, we develop a scale for the disruptiveness of innovations. We collected data from senior executives (vice president or general manager level) at 199 strategic business units (SBUs) in 38 Fortune 500 corporations and performed a series of analyses to establish the reliability and validity of the disruptiveness scale. The reliability measures, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and subsequent statistical tests strongly support our measure. Further, we also present nomological validity of the disruptiveness construct, thus establishing its predictive validity. Thus, this paper distinguishes the disruptiveness concept from other established innovation constructs, such as radicalness and competency destroying. Finally, we discuss the significance of our results and how this study might be useful to other researchers. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.511

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Kopalle, Praveen K.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-22
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
189-199
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2050497195
Cited by
410
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
19.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dartmouth College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
innovation measurement, scale development, reliability and validity, nomological network, innovator's dilemma, incumbent firms, Fortune 500 companies, strategic business units, competitive advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review