Cited by 520Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Instagram #Instasad?: Exploring Associations Among Instagram Use, Depressive Symptoms, Negative Social Comparison, and Strangers Followed

Lup, Katerina, Trub, Leora, Rosenthal, Lisa·2015·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

As the use and influence of social networking continues to grow, researchers have begun to explore its consequences for psychological well-being. Some research suggests that Facebook use can have negative consequences for well-being. Instagram, a photo-sharing social network created in 2010, has particular characteristics that may make users susceptible to negative consequences. This study tested a theoretically grounded moderated meditation model of the association between Instagram use and depressive symptoms through the mechanism of negative social comparison, and moderation by amount of strangers one follows. One hundred and seventeen 18-29 year olds completed online questionnaires containing demographics, frequency of Instagram use, amount of strangers followed on Instagram, the Center for Epidemiological Resources Scale for Depression, and the Social Comparison Rating Scale. Instagram use was marginally positively associated with depressive symptoms, and positive social comparison was significantly negatively associated with depressive symptoms. Amount of strangers followed moderated the associations of Instagram use with social comparison (significantly) and depressive symptoms (marginally), and further significantly moderated the indirect association of Instagram use with depressive symptoms through social comparison. Findings generally suggest that more frequent Instagram use has negative associations for people who follow more strangers, but positive associations for people who follow fewer strangers, with social comparison and depressive symptoms. Implications of negative associations of social networking for people who follow strangers and the need for more research on Instagram use given its increasing popularity are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2014.0560

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Those who use image-based platforms to interact with people they know personally are not at risk for negative consequences, whilst those who view and interact with image-based content from strangers are more likely to engage in negative social comparisons and have depressive symptoms.

    “Specifically, it seems that those who use image-based platforms to interact with people they know personally are not at risk for negative consequences, whilst those who view and interact with image-based content from strangers are more likely to engage in negative social comparisons and have depressive symptoms [52].”
  • Positive correlations were found between depression and negative social networking interactions.

    “positive correlations were found between depression and negative social networking interactions, 34,39,40”
  • Negative comparison with others when using Facebook predicted depression via increased rumination even when a general tendency to engage in social comparison was controlled for.

    “For example, negative comparison with others when using Facebook was found to predict depression via increased rumination even when a general tendency to engage in social comparison was controlled for.39”
  • The effect of social comparison on Facebook is inherently different from and may be more detrimental to psychological wellbeing than social comparison in real life.

    “The fact that negative comparison with others when using Facebook was found to predict depression via increased rumination even when a general tendency to engage in social comparison offline was controlled for 39 suggests that the effect of social comparison on Facebook is inherently different and may be more detrimental to psychological wellbeing than social comparison in real life.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lup, K., Trub, L., & Rosenthal, L.
Affiliations
Pace University (US)
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
247-252
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2263228652
Cited by
520
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
77.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
Instagram use, depressive symptoms, social networking sites, moderated mediation, young adults, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Jealousy, Loneliness, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Utilization Review, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review