Cited by 474Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health via Writing

Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication

Reinecke, Leonard, Trepte, Sabine·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Reinecke, Leonard
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
30
Pages
95-102
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975204823
Cited by
474
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12
FWCI
37.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
social network sites, psychological well-being, subjective well-being, positivity bias, reciprocal effects, self-disclosure, online self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review