The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In moral-personal dilemmas, this emotional response is thought to be too strong to be overruled by the cognitive system.”
From TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing (2014) · cites this paper as Greene, 2007
In the citing paper
“In contrast, in moral-impersonal dilemmas, cognitive control over the lower emotional response leads participants to favor the utilitarian option (Greene, 2007).”
From TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing (2014) · cites this paper as Greene, 2007
Citations
Cites
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05631 · Cited by 1,545
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Greene, 2001, An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science, 293, 2105, 10.1126/science.1062872 · DOI · Paper page
- Greene, 2004, The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment, Neuron, 44, 389, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · DOI · Paper page
- Moll, 2007, Moral judgments, emotions, and the utilitarian brain, Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, 319, 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.001 · DOI
- Thomson, 1985, The trolley problem, Yale Law J., 94, 1395, 10.2307/796133 · DOI
- Valdesolo, 2006, Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment, Psychol. Sci., 17, 476, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x · DOI
- Mendez, 2005, An investigation of moral judgment in frontotemporal dementia, Cogn. Behav. Neurol., 18, 193, 10.1097/01.wnn.0000191292.17964.bb · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031021 · Cited by 696
Bzdok, D., Schilbach, L., Vogeley, K., Schneider, K., Laird, A. R., Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y · Cited by 653
Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion
Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Hauser, M. D., & Robbins, T. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009396107 · Cited by 526
Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000093 · Cited by 434
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000165 · Cited by 317
No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes
Ryan, T. J. (2017) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12248 · Cited by 273
Risen, J. L. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000017 · Cited by 221
A Psychophysiological Investigation of Moral Judgment after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage
Moretto, G., Làdavas, E., Mattioli, F., & di Pellegrino, G. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21367 · Cited by 182
TMS affects moral judgment, showing the role of DLPFC and TPJ in cognitive and emotional processing
Jeurissen, D., Sack, A. T., Roebroeck, A., Russ, B. E., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00018 · Cited by 93
Byrd, N., & Conway, P. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007 · Cited by 77
Abnormal moral reasoning in complete and partial callosotomy patients
Miller, M. B., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Young, L., King, D., Paggi, A., Fabri, M., Polonara, G., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.021 · Cited by 54
Verdejo‐Garcia, A., Contreras‐Rodríguez, O., Fonseca, F., Cuenca, A., Soriano‐Mas, C., Rodriguez, J., Pardo‐Lozano, R., Blanco‐Hinojo, L., de Sola Llopis, S., Farré, M., et al. (2014) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00472.x · Cited by 53
tDCS Over DLPFC Leads to Less Utilitarian Response in Moral-Personal Judgment
Zheng, H., Lu, X., & Huang, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00193 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, J. D.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 322-323
- ISSN
- 1364-6613
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
