The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From contextual fear to a dynamic view of memory systems
Open accessAbstract
The brain does not learn and remember in a unitary fashion. Rather, different circuits specialize in certain classes of problems and encode different types of information. Damage to one of these systems typically results in amnesia only for the form of memory that is the specialty of the affected region. However, the question of how the brain allocates a specific category of memory to a particular circuit has received little attention. The currently dominant view (multiple memory systems theory) assumes that such abilities are hard wired. Using fear conditioning as a paradigmatic case, I propose an alternative model in which mnemonic processing is allocated to specific circuits through a dynamic process. Potential circuits compete to form memories, with the most efficient circuits emerging as winners. However, alternate circuits compensate when these 'primary' circuits are compromised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, the hippocampus, known for its contextual sensitivity (Fanselow, 2010; Hirsh, 1974, Rudy, 2009, Fanselow, 2010), helps encode episodic and emotional information that arises during motivationally relevant events.”
From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Fanselow, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · Cited by 7,322
Rescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,268
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.
Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274 · Cited by 3,292
Modality-Specific Retrograde Amnesia of Fear
Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1585183 · Cited by 2,483
Self-citationSpecies-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning
Bolles, R. C. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0028589 · Cited by 1,610
Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiological perspective
Squire, L. R., & Alvarez, P. (1995) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(95)80023-9 · Cited by 1,412
The Structure and Organization of Memory
Squire, L. R., Knowlton, B. J., & Musen, G. (1993) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.002321 · Cited by 1,159
The neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of conditioned fear
Fendt, M., & Fanselow, M. S. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00016-0 · Cited by 1,092
Self-citationProbability of shock in the presence and absence of cs in fear conditioning.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025984 · Cited by 1,067
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The contextual brain: implications for fear conditioning, extinction and psychopathology
Maren, S., Phan, K. L., & Liberzon, I. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3492 · Cited by 1,547
The hippocampus as a predictive map
Stachenfeld, K. L., Botvinick, M. M., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4650 · Cited by 1,000
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837
“This means that presenting the S alone for some time (allowing for anticipation of the upcomng US) leads to facilitated fear learning and that it has the ability o measure the CR (cf. Fanselow, 2010).”
Izquierdo, I., Furini, C. R. G., & Myskiw, J. C. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2015 · Cited by 453
Neural and cellular mechanisms of fear and extinction memory formation
Orsini, C. A., & Maren, S. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.014 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Fanselow, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fanselow, Michael S.
- ORCID
- Fanselow, Michael S.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-15
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2818345
- OpenAlex
- W2041659763
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062122, MH62122)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- contextual fear, fear conditioning, memory systems, memory allocation, memory compensation, amnesia, memory encoding
- MeSH terms
- Conditioning, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Judgment, Memory, Models, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review