Cited by 151Neural dynamics and brain functionCognitive Computing and NetworksNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The human Turing machine: a neural framework for mental programs

Open access
Zylberberg, Ariel, Dehaene, Stanislas, Roelfsema, Pieter R., Sigman, Mariano·2011·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

In recent years much has been learned about how a single computational processing step is implemented in the brain. By contrast, we still have surprisingly little knowledge of the neuronal mechanisms by which multiple such operations are sequentially assembled into mental algorithms. We outline a theory of how individual neural processing steps might be combined into serial programs. We propose a hybrid neuronal device: each step involves massively parallel computation that feeds a slow and serial production system. Production selection is mediated by a system of competing accumulator neurons that extends the role of these neurons beyond the selection of a motor action. Productions change the state of sensory and mnemonic neurons and iteration of such cycles provides a basis for mental programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.007

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attentional signals select information by amplifying its activity and reducing that of competing stimuli, whereas persistent neuronal activity keeps information online in working memory.

    “Attentional signals select a particular piece of information by amplifying its activity and reducing that of other competing stimuli, whereas persistent neuronal activity keeps information online in working memory (Roelfsema, 2005; Roelfsema et al., 2000; Zylberberg et al., 2011).”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Zylberberg et al., 2011

    The ‘Single decision making by evidence accumulation’ section says sustained neuronal firing stores temporary, task-relevant information, and the ‘Opinion’ section describes attentional modulation as enhanced activity for selected visual information. The copy does not say that attention reduces the activity of competing stimuli; its discussion of mutual inhibition concerns competing productions instead. Page numbers were not provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Attended memory items can activate subsequent memory states to retrieve an association or as part of a cognitive routine, such as when a mental image is transformed during mental rotation.

    “Attended memory items csan activate subsequent memory states in order to retrieve an association or as part of a cognitive routine when, for example, a mental image is transformed during mental rotation (genuinely meriting the name “working” memory) (Zylberberg et al., 2011).”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Zylberberg et al., 2011

    The ‘Single decision making by evidence accumulation’ section says stored information is used by subsequent operations, and the Opinion section describes a remembered color guiding the next step of a visual routine. These passages support sequential use of working-memory contents, but our copy does not describe retrieving an association or transforming a mental image during mental rotation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Boole, G. (2007/1854) An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, Cosimo 2 Turing, A.M. (1936) On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 230-265
  2. Von Neumann, J. (1958) The Computer and the Brain, Yale University Press
  3. Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations In The Microstructure Of Cognition. Volume 1. Foundations, MIT Press
  4. Roelfsema, P.R. et al. (2003) Subtask sequencing in the primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5467-5472
  5. Shadlen, M.N. et al. (2008) Neurobiology of decision making: an intentional framework. In Better than Conscious?: Decision Making, the Human Mind, and Implications for Institutions (Engel, C. and Singer, W., eds), pp. 71-101, The MIT Press
  6. Dehaene, S. et al. (2003) A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8520-8525
  7. Newell, A. (1990) Unified Theories of Cognition, Harvard University Press 41
  8. Wise, S.P. and Mauritz, K.H. (1985) Set-related neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys: effects of changes in motor set. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 223, 331-354
  9. Sutton, R.S. and Barto, A.G. (1998) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, The MIT press 48

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zylberberg, A., Dehaene, S., Roelfsema, P. R., & Sigman, M.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Sigman, Mariano
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
293-300
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135544531
Cited by
151
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
serial processing, production systems, hybrid neural architecture, massively parallel computing, sensory neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Humans, Mental Processes, Models, Neurological, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review