Cited by 46Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAction Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and Adaptation

The syntax of action.

Pulvermüller, Friedemann·2014·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pulvermüller, F.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
219-220
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986837166
Cited by
46
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J004561/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
center embedding, recursion, hierarchy, everyday action, apraxia, dementia, action schemas, language as action, speech acts, cognitive linguistics, embodied cognition, embodied language, embodied semantics
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Language, Psycholinguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review