The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S.
Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Allum, N. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5426.384 · Cited by 590
RetractedRisk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390002500101 · Cited by 2,240
STEPTOE, A., POLLARD, T. M., & WARDLE, J. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061 · Cited by 2,176
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
The Social Amplification of Risk
(2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511550461 · Cited by 1,284
The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology
Siegrist, M. (2000) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020 · Cited by 1,092
Self-citationNanoscale materials development – a food industry perspective
Sanguansri, P., & Augustin, M. A. (2006) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2006.04.010 · Cited by 672
Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health?
Verbeke, W. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.003 · Cited by 640
Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence
Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., & Earle, T. C. (2005) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/1366987032000105315 · Cited by 638
Self-citation
Cited by
Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058 · Cited by 1,048
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
The Potential Role of Insects as Feed: A Multi-Perspective Review.
Sogari, G., Amato, M., Biasato, I., Chiesa, S., & Gasco, L. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9040119 · Cited by 395
Coderoni, S., & Perito, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119870 · Cited by 298
3D food printing: main components selection by considering rheological properties
Jiang, H., Zheng, L., Zou, Y., Tong, Z., Han, S., & Wang, S. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1514363 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- SIEGRIST, M.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 603-608
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994994084
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.017
- The paper
- SIEGRIST, M. (2008). Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
