The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conventional and emerging detection techniques for pathogenic bacteria in food science: A review
Abstract
Abstract Background Continuous transformation and development of new detection tools for bacteria has converted the laborious scientific work into smart apparatus in recent years. The journey had begun with the culture-based plate enumeration, and now it has evolved into several culture-independent techniques. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is on the top of the list that is now a routinely used biological approach to detect bacterial cells. Instrumental techniques are also helpful in this regard, as they are more sensitive for detection of various microbes. Scope and approach In this review, we described new trends and their practical application in the fields of detection microbiology and food technology. This study provides a brief overview of conventional and modern detection techniques which includes nucleic-acid sequence based techniques to non-destructive imaging techniques. Key findings and conclusions Besides the availability of antibiotics and clinical treatments, bacterial infections significantly increase the mortality rate. It is necessary to detect apparent infectious agents beforehand. Therefore, the detection methods for microorganisms should be more rapid, smart and reliable in response to the need. Conventional detection techniques are slow and time-consuming but more accurate and reliable than the modern detection techniques. By combing the mentioned techniques, scientists can achieve better results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pathogen detection: A perspective of traditional methods and biosensors
Lazcka, O., Campo, F. J. D., & Muñoz, F. X. (2007) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2006.06.036 · Cited by 1,500
A field guide to bacterial swarming motility
Kearns, D. B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2405 · Cited by 1,483
Law, J. W.-F., Ab Mutalib, N.-S., Chan, K.-G., & Lee, L.-H. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770 · Cited by 1,205
Field guide to next‐generation DNA sequencers
GLENN, T. C. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03024.x · Cited by 940
Biosensors for detection of pathogenic bacteria
Ivnitski, D., Abdel-Hamid, I., Atanasov, P., & Wilkins, E. (1999) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/s0956-5663(99)00039-1 · Cited by 931
Microbial biosensors: A review
Su, L., Jia, W., Hou, C., & Lei, Y. (2011) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2010.09.005 · Cited by 725
Optical Biosensors for the Detection of Pathogenic Microorganisms
Yoo, S. M., & Lee, S. Y. (2016) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.012 · Cited by 571
Recent advances in biologically sensitive field-effect transistors (BioFETs)
Schöning, M. J., & Poghossian, A. (2002) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b204444g · Cited by 566
SERS Detection of Bacteria in Water by in Situ Coating with Ag Nanoparticles
Zhou, H., Yang, D., Ivleva, N. P., Mircescu, N. E., Niessner, R., & Haisch, C. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac402935p · Cited by 408
Detection of microorganisms using terahertz metamaterials
Park, S. J., Hong, J. T., Choi, S. J., Kim, H. S., Park, W. K., Han, S. T., Park, J. Y., Lee, S., Kim, D. S., & Ahn, Y. H. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04988 · Cited by 406
Cited by
Recent Advances in Intrinsically Fluorescent Polydopamine Materials
Su, H., & Zhao, F. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12094560 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Hameed, S., Xie, L., & Ying, Y.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 61-73
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2812228830
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conventional and emerging detection techniques for pathogenic bacteria in food science: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.020
- The paper
- Hameed, S., Xie, L., & Ying, Y. (2018). Conventional and emerging detection techniques for pathogenic bacteria in food science: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.