Cited by 398Race, Genetics, and SocietyGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic Research

Next generation disparities in human genomics: concerns and remedies

Need, Anna C., Goldstein, David B.·2009·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Studies of human genetics, particularly genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have concentrated heavily on European populations, with individuals of African ancestry rarely represented. Reasons for this include the distribution of biomedical funding and the increased population structure and reduced linkage disequilibrium in African populations. Currently, few GWAS findings have clinical utility and, therefore, the field has not yet contributed to health-care disparities. As human genomics research progresses towards the whole-genome sequencing era, however, more clinically relevant results are likely to be discovered. As we discuss here, to avoid the genetics community contributing to healthcare disparities, it is important to adopt measures to ensure that populations of diverse ancestry are included in genomic studies, and that no major population groups are excluded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2009.09.012

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor generalizability of genetic studies across populations arises from the overwhelming abundance of European descent studies and dearth of well-powered studies in globally diverse populations.

    “Poor generalizability of genetic studies across populations arises from the overwhelming abundance of European descent studies and dearth of well-powered studies in globally diverse populations25–28.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Need, A. C., & Goldstein, D. B.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Need, Anna C.
  • Goldstein, David B.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
489-494
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010380543
Cited by
398
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
health disparities, genomic diversity, underrepresented groups, African ancestry, population structure, linkage disequilibrium, genome-wide association study, whole genome sequencing, biomedical research funding
MeSH terms
Humans, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Genomics, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review