Cited by 221Gut microbiota and healthResearch Data Management PracticesRace, Genetics, and Society

Public human microbiome data are dominated by highly developed countries

Open access
Abdill, Richard J., Adamowicz, Elizabeth M., Blekhman, Ran·2022·PLoS Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The importance of sampling from globally representative populations has been well established in human genomics. In human microbiome research, however, we lack a full understanding of the global distribution of sampling in research studies. This information is crucial to better understand global patterns of microbiome-associated diseases and to extend the health benefits of this research to all populations. Here, we analyze the country of origin of all 444,829 human microbiome samples that are available from the world's 3 largest genomic data repositories, including the Sequence Read Archive (SRA). The samples are from 2,592 studies of 19 body sites, including 220,017 samples of the gut microbiome. We show that more than 71% of samples with a known origin come from Europe, the United States, and Canada, including 46.8% from the US alone, despite the country representing only 4.3% of the global population. We also find that central and southern Asia is the most underrepresented region: Countries such as India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh account for more than a quarter of the world population but make up only 1.8% of human microbiome samples. These results demonstrate a critical need to ensure more global representation of participants in microbiome studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001536

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbiome members of individuals from non-westernized populations are underrepresented by current cultivation-based genomic catalogs, causing metagenomic profiling to miss large fractions of microbial diversity.

    “Microbiome members of individuals from non-westernized populations are particularly underrepresented by current cultivation-based genomic catalogs causing metagenomic profiling approaches to miss large fractions of the microbial diversity in the samples.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22]NCBI. Biosample Attributes. In: BioSample [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 21]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/docs/attributes/
  2. [68]Organismal metagenomes. In: NCBI Taxonomy Browser [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Undef&id=410656&lvl=3&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock
  3. [71]BioSample: Organism information. In: NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/docs/organism/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdill, R. J., Adamowicz, E. M., & Blekhman, R.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Blekhman, Ran
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2022-02-15
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
e3001536
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W4213375238
Cited by
221
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 18 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R35GM128716)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
human microbiome, sampling bias, geographical representation, gut microbiota, Sequence Read Archive, underrepresented groups, global health equity
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Asia, Bangladesh, Canada, Europe, Geography, Humans, India, Pakistan, United States, Developed Countries, Genomics, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review