Cited by 1,130Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 141 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits

Open access
Der-Avakian, Andre, Markou, Athina·2012·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Anhedonia, or markedly diminished interest or pleasure, is a hallmark symptom of major depression, schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Over the past three decades, the clinical definition of anhedonia has remained relatively unchanged, although cognitive psychology and behavioral neuroscience have expanded our understanding of other reward-related processes. Here, we review the neural bases of the construct of anhedonia that reflects deficits in hedonic capacity and also closely linked to the constructs of reward valuation, decision-making, anticipation and motivation. The neural circuits subserving these reward-related processes include the ventral striatum, prefrontal cortical regions, and afferent and efferent projections. An understanding of anhedonia and other reward-related constructs will facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of disorders that include reward deficits as key symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 141 references

3 of the 141 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Der-Avakian, A., & Markou, A.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Markou, Athina
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
68-77
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012129255
Cited by
1,130
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (F32MH080585, R01MH087989, R01MH62527)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
anhedonia, reward processing, reward valuation, decision-making, reward anticipation, motivation, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, ventral striatum, prefrontal cortex, neural circuits, hedonic capacity
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurobiology, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review