Cited by 241Adventure Sports and Sensation SeekingRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research

The relationship between white-water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: A flow theory perspective

Wu, Cedric Hsi-Jui, Liang, Rong-Da·2011·Tourism Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.001

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C. H.-J., & Liang, R.-D.
Affiliations
National Dong Hwa University (TW)
Corresponding author
Wu, Cedric Hsi-Jui
Venue
Tourism Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
317-325
ISSN
0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989514342
Cited by
241
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tourism Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Keywords
whitewater rafting, flow experience, adventure tourism, tourist satisfaction, tourist loyalty, tourist motivation, challenge level, playfulness, positive mood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review