Cited by 411Adventure Sports and Sensation SeekingDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Playing with risk? Participant perceptions of risk and management implications in adventure tourism

Cater, Carl I.·2006·Tourism Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.10.005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Berno, 1996, The nature of the adventure experience in Queenstown, Australian Leisure, 8, 21
  2. Glasgow Press and Journal (1999). Swiss guides survivors face charges (31st July), p. 17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cater, C. I.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cater, Carl I.
Venue
Tourism Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
317-325
ISSN
0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058649649
Cited by
411
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tourism Management (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
adventure tourism, risk perception, sensation seeking, fear, risk management, corporate sustainability, Queenstown, participant motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review