Cited by 18AI in Service InteractionsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Beauty or the Borg: Agentic artificial intelligence organizational socialization in synergistic Hybrid Transformative Dynamic Flows

Open access
Stylos, Nikolaos, Okumus, Fevzi, Onder, Irem·2025·Tourism Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105205

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stylos, N., Okumus, F., & Onder, I.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Tourism Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
111
Pages
105205
ISSN
0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409870971
Cited by
18
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 5
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Tourism Management (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
agentic AI, tourism organizations, management decision-making, socio-technical systems theory, price optimization, trust building, organizational legitimacy, resource allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review