Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 3D microfluidic liver model for high throughput compound toxicity screening in the OrganoPlate®

Open access
Bircsak, Kristin M., DeBiasio, Richard, Miedel, Mark, Alsebahi, Alaa, Reddinger, Ryan, Saleh, Anthony, Shun, Tongying, Vernetti, Lawrence A., Gough, Albert·2021·Toxicology

Abstract

We report the development, automation and validation of a 3D, microfluidic liver-on-a-chip for high throughput hepatotoxicity screening, the OrganoPlate LiverTox™. The model is comprised of aggregates of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived hepatocytes (iHep) seeded in an extracellular matrix in the organ channel and co-cultured with endothelial cells and THP-1 monoblasts differentiated to macrophages seeded in the vascular channel of the 96 well Mimetas OrganoPlate 2-lane. A key component of high throughput screening is automation and we report a protocol to seed, dose, collect and replenish media and add assay reagents in the OrganoPlate 2-lane using a standard laboratory liquid handling robot. A combination of secretome measurements and image-based analysis was used to demonstrate stable 15 day cell viability, albumin and urea secretion. Over the same time-period, CYP3A4 activity increased and alpha-fetoprotein secretion decreased suggesting further maturation of the iHeps. Troglitazone, a clinical hepatotoxin, was chosen as a control compound for validation studies. Albumin, urea, hepatocyte nuclear size and viability staining provided Robust Z’factors > 0.2 in plates treated 72 h with 180 μM troglitazone compared with a vehicle control. The viability assay provided the most robust statistic for a Robust Z’ factor = 0.6. A small library of 159 compounds with known liver effects was added to the OrganoPlate LiverTox model for 72 h at 50 μM and the Toxicological Prioritization scores were calculated. A follow up dose-response evaluation of select hits revealed the albumin assay to be the most sensitive in calculating TC50 values. This platform provides a robust, novel model which can be used for high throughput hepatotoxicity screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tox.2020.152667

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Bircsak, K. M., DeBiasio, R., Miedel, M., Alsebahi, A., Reddinger, R., Saleh, A., Shun, T., Vernetti, L. A., & Gough, A.
Venue
Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
450
Pages
152667
ISSN
0300-483X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3115778807
Cited by
192
References
13
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 3D microfluidic liver model for high throughput compound toxicity screening in the OrganoPlate®. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tox.2020.152667
The paper
Bircsak, K. M., DeBiasio, R., Miedel, M., Alsebahi, A., Reddinger, R., Saleh, A., Shun, T., Vernetti, L. A., & Gough, A. (2021). A 3D microfluidic liver model for high throughput compound toxicity screening in the OrganoPlate®. Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2020.152667

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.