Cited by 39Air Quality and Health ImpactsAsthma and respiratory diseasesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Effects of prenatal diesel exhaust inhalation on pulmonary inflammation and development of specific immune responses

Sharkhuu, Tuya, Doerfler, Donald L., Krantz, Q. Todd, Luebke, Robert W., Linak, William P., Gilmour, M. Ian·2010·Toxicology Letters

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that exposure to air pollutants during pregnancy can result in a number of deleterious effects including low birth weight and the incidence of allergic asthma. To investigate the in utero effects of DE exposure, timed pregnant BALB/c mice were exposed to 0, 0.8 or 3.1 mg/m(3) of DE during gestation days (GD) 9 to GD 18. The number of successful pregnancies was 15/20 in the air controls and 10/20 in each of the diesel exposures. Immune function in the 6-week-old offspring as determined by development of delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions to bovine serum albumin (BSA), antibody titers to injected sheep red blood cells (SRBC), splenic T cells expressing CD45(+)CD3(+)CD8(+) and CD3(+)CD25(+), and mRNA expression of TNF-alpha, TLR2, SP-A, TGF-beta and Foxp3 in the lung were not affected by prenatal DE exposure. On the other hand, lung TLR4 mRNA expression, the number of neutrophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and splenic T cells expressing CD45(+)CD3(+)CD4(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+) were differentially affected depending on the DE concentration and gender. When additional groups of mice were sensitized and challenged via the respiratory tract with ovalbumin to induce allergic airway inflammation, female mice had higher protein levels in the BALF compared to males and this was reduced by prenatal exposure to either concentration of DE. No other changes in allergen-induced immunity, lung function or severity of inflammation were noted…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharkhuu, T., Doerfler, D. L., Krantz, Q. T., Luebke, R. W., Linak, W. P., & Gilmour, M. I.
Affiliations
Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Gilmour, M. Ian
Venue
Toxicology Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
196
Issue
1
Pages
12-20
ISSN
0378-4274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010531312
Cited by
39
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
diesel exhaust, prenatal exposure, air pollution, lung inflammation, allergic airway inflammation, delayed-type hypersensitivity, T cell subsets, Foxp3, TLR4, neutrophils, gender differences, allergen sensitization, ovalbumin, immune system development, BALB/c mice
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Animals, Immunotoxins, Atmosphere Exposure Chambers, Vehicle Emissions, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Pneumonia, Pregnancy, Respiratory Hypersensitivity, T-Lymphocytes, Antigens, CD, Cytokines, Maternal Exposure, Inhalation Exposure, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review