Cited by 62Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

A cognitive mapping approach to analyse stakeholders’ perspectives on sustainable aviation fuels

Open access
Ahmad, Salman, Xu, Bing·2021·Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Abstract

Despite sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) provides a viable option to decarbonise global aviation, the fuel transition to the commercial level is stagnant. Our paper investigates the key barriers and opportunities in upscaling the SAF consumption perceived by industrial stakeholders along the SAF supply chain. The primary interview data of stakeholders is analysed using the cognitive mapping approach. We contribute to the literature by developing multi-layer cognitive maps of stakeholder groups followed by a composite map to investigate the SAF development process. Though there is a common goal of lowering emissions, producers, airlines, distributors, and governmental and other advocating agencies map their distinct paths. Furthermore, our composite cognitive map presents strategic levers which are critical in SAF development and are shared by all shareholder groups. Such an understanding of SAF development is instrumental in developing progressive strategies for expediting the transition to SAF that balances environmental sustainability and economic benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103076

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ronald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle and Donna J. Wood Published by : Academy of Management Stable URL : https://www.jstor.o. 22(4), 853-886.
  2. Rosenhead, J., Mingers, J. (Eds.), 2001. Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, 2nd ed. Wiley https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Rational+Analysis+for+a+Problematic+World+Revisited%3A+Problem+Structuring+Methods+for+ Complexity%2C+Uncertainty+and+Conflict%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780471495239.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, S., & Xu, B.
Affiliations
Heriot-Watt University (GB)
Corresponding author
Xu, Bing
Venue
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
100
Pages
103076
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210870671
Cited by
58
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Heriot Watt University (EP/N009924/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
sustainable aviation fuel, stakeholder perspectives, aviation decarbonization, fuel switching, airline industry, government agencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review