Cited by 857Genetic diversity and population structureEvolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue

TALLMON, D, LUIKART, G, WAPLES, R·2004·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

A series of important new theoretical, experimental and observational studies demonstrate that just a few immigrants can have positive immediate impacts on the evolutionary trajectory of local populations. In many cases, a low level of immigration into small populations has produced fitness benefits that are greater than those predicted by theoretical models, resulting in what has been termed 'genetic rescue'. However, the opposite result (reduced fitness) can also be associated with immigration of genetically divergent individuals. Central to our understanding of genetic rescue are complex interactions among fundamental concepts in evolutionary and population biology, including both genetic and non-genetic (environmental, behavioral and demographic) factors. Developing testable models to predict when genetic rescue is likely to occur is a daunting challenge that will require carefully controlled, multi-generation experiments as well as creative use of information from natural 'experiments'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simulations show that offspring resulting from interbreeding between the two saola populations would have higher fitness due to the reduction in genetic load, a phenomenon referred to as genetic rescue.

    “Moreover, we show by simulations that offspring resulting from interbreeding between the two populations would have higher fitness due to the reduction in genetic load, a phenomenon referred to as genetic rescue.64,65”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TALLMON, D., LUIKART, G., & WAPLES, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
TALLMON, D
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
489-496
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008860175
Cited by
857
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 60
FWCI
13.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
genetic rescue, immigration, small populations, inbreeding depression, genetic divergence, evolutionary rescue, population genetics, demographic factors, non-genetic factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review