The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue
Abstract
A series of important new theoretical, experimental and observational studies demonstrate that just a few immigrants can have positive immediate impacts on the evolutionary trajectory of local populations. In many cases, a low level of immigration into small populations has produced fitness benefits that are greater than those predicted by theoretical models, resulting in what has been termed 'genetic rescue'. However, the opposite result (reduced fitness) can also be associated with immigration of genetically divergent individuals. Central to our understanding of genetic rescue are complex interactions among fundamental concepts in evolutionary and population biology, including both genetic and non-genetic (environmental, behavioral and demographic) factors. Developing testable models to predict when genetic rescue is likely to occur is a daunting challenge that will require carefully controlled, multi-generation experiments as well as creative use of information from natural 'experiments'.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simulations show that offspring resulting from interbreeding between the two saola populations would have higher fitness due to the reduction in genetic load, a phenomenon referred to as genetic rescue.
“Moreover, we show by simulations that offspring resulting from interbreeding between the two populations would have higher fitness due to the reduction in genetic load, a phenomenon referred to as genetic rescue.64,65”
From Genomes of critically endangered saola are shaped by population structure and purging (2025) · cites this paper as [64]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management
Hohenlohe, P. A., Funk, W. C., & Rajora, O. P. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15720 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
The inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics
Teixeira, J. C., & Huber, C. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2015096118 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
The Genetic Cost of Neanderthal Introgression
Harris, K., & Nielsen, R. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.186890 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences
Hendry, A. P., Gotanda, K. M., & Svensson, E. I. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0028 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Markers in Conservation Biology
Ujvari, B., & Belov, K. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12085168 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
When gene flow really matters: gene flow in applied evolutionary biology
Ellstrand, N. C., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2016) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12402 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Noninvasive Sampling Reveals Short-Term Genetic Rescue in an Insular Red Fox Population
Quinn, C. B., Alden, P. B., & Sacks, B. N. (2019) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esz024 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Genomes of critically endangered saola are shaped by population structure and purging
Garcia-Erill, G., Liu, S., Le, M. D., Hurley, M. M., Nguyen, H. D., Nguyen, D. Q., Nguyen, D. H., Santander, C. G., Sánchez Barreiro, F., Gomes Martins, N. F., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.040 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- TALLMON, D., LUIKART, G., & WAPLES, R.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- TALLMON, D
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 489-496
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008860175
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- genetic rescue, immigration, small populations, inbreeding depression, genetic divergence, evolutionary rescue, population genetics, demographic factors, non-genetic factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review