Cited by 224Primate Behavior and EcologyFace recognition and analysisFace Recognition and Perception

Chimpanzee face recognition from videos in the wild using deep learning

Open access
Schofield, Daniel, Nagrani, Arsha, Zisserman, Andrew, Hayashi, Misato, Matsuzawa, Tetsuro, Biro, Dora, Carvalho, Susana·2019·Science Advances

Abstract

Wild ape face recognition using artificial intelligence opens the way for fully automated analysis of large-scale video datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aaw0736

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that study, humans achieved identification accuracy between 20% (novices) and 42% (experts) with annotation time between 1 and 2 hours, while the DL model achieved 84% in seconds.

    “where humans achieved identification accuracy between 20% (novices) and 42% (experts) with an annotation time between 1 and 2 h, the DL model achieved an identification accuracy of 84% in a matter of seconds.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

  • A study of 23 chimpanzees in Guinea applied facial recognition to a multi-year dataset of 1 million images and achieved greater than 90% accuracy.

    “a study of a small group of 23 chimpanzees in Guinea applied facial recognition techniques to a multi-year dataset comprising 1 million images and achieved >90% accuracy38.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

  • Conventional and more recently DL-based methods have reached strong performance for specific taxa, especially across small populations.

    “Yet, conventional101 and more recently DL-based38,54,102 methods have reached strong performance for specific taxa, especially across small populations.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016), vol. 1.
  2. [27]J. Yosinski, J. Clune, Y. Bengio, H. Lipson, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2014), pp. 3320–3328.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schofield, D., Nagrani, A., Zisserman, A., Hayashi, M., Matsuzawa, T., Biro, D., & Carvalho, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Schofield, Daniel
  • Nagrani, Arsha
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2019-09-06
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
eaaw0736-eaaw0736
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971892976
Cited by
224
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3
FWCI
30.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2016-114); MEXT-JSPS (#16H06283) and LGP-U04,)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • EPSRC (EP/M013774/1)
  • Google PhD fellowship
  • Clarendon Fund
  • Boise Trust Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
chimpanzees, face recognition, face detection, face tracking, personal identification, sex identification, social network structure, population aging, automated video analysis, animal behavior
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Animals, Pan troglodytes, Female, Male, Video Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review