Cited by 8Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionTraffic and Road SafetyMedia Influence and Health

Texting and tombstones: Impact of mortality salience on risky driving intentions

Frietze, Gabriel, Cohn, Lawrence D.·2018·Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frietze, G., & Cohn, L. D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Corresponding author
Frietze, Gabriel
Venue
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
59
Pages
1-11
ISSN
1369-8478 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888438085
Cited by
8
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
mortality salience, mobile phone use while driving, driver distraction, terror management theory, self-image, public health campaigns, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review