Cited by 182Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Terror management and cognitive-experiential self-theory: Evidence that terror management occurs in the experiential system

Simon, Linda, Greenberg, Jeff, Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Solomon, Sheldon, Pyszczynski, Tom, Arndt, Jamie, Abend, Teresa·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors hypothesized, on the basis of terror management theory and cognitive-experiential self-theory, that participants in an experiential mode of thinking would respond to mortality salience with increased worldview defense and increased accessibility of death-related thoughts, whereas participants in a rational mode would not. Results from 3 studies provided convergent evidence that when participants were in an experiential mode, mortality salience produced the typical worldview defense effect, but when participants were in a rational mode it did not. Study 4 revealed that mortality salience also led to a delayed increase in the accessibility of death-related thoughts only when participants were in an experiential mode. These results supported the notion that worldwide defense is intensified only if individuals are in an experiential mode when considering their mortality. Discussion focuses on implications for understanding terror management processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1132

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Harmon-Jones, E., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., & Abend, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1997
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1132-1146
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2097136728
Cited by
181
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
terror management theory, cognitive-experiential self-theory, mortality salience, worldview defense, death-related thoughts, fear of death
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Death, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality, Self Concept, Social Perception, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review