Cited by 80Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

A Terror Management Perspective on the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals

Shehryar, Omar, Hunt, David M.·2005·Journal of Consumer Psychology

Abstract

We use terror management theory (TMT) to show that the nature of the threatening consequences included in fear‐appeal communications influences the responses to the messages promoted in such communications. On the basis of differences between death‐related consequences and non‐death‐related consequences, they provide an explanation for maladaptive responses to fear appeals. Results from 2 experiments indicate that participants who were highly committed to a worldview of drinking alcohol rejected socially acceptable attitudes toward drinking and driving when the message containing such attitudes was accompanied by a fear appeal that contained death as a consequence, but not when fear appeals contained the fear of arrest or serious injury. Participants perceived their level of experienced fear to be the same across the experimental conditions. The results have implications for considering the qualitative nature of the threatening consequence in fear‐appeal research and for using TMT to understand maladaptive responses to fear‐appeal communications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_2

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals strongly committed to drinking alcohol were more likely to reject a 'do not drink and drive' message when death, rather than arrest or serious injury, was the consequence of drinking and driving.

    “Shehryar and Hunt (2005) reported that individuals who were strongly committed to drinking alcohol were more likely to reject a 'do not drink and drive' message when death, rather than arrest or serious injury, was the consequence of drinking when driving.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shehryar, O., & Hunt, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Montana State University (US)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Shehryar, Omar
Venue
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
275-287
ISSN
  • 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7663
OpenAlex
W2064456947
Cited by
80
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
terror management theory, fear appeals, maladaptive responses, alcohol consumption, drinking and driving, persuasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review