Cited by 87Impact of Technology on AdolescentsHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyTraffic and Road Safety

The mediating role of smartphone addiction on the relationship between personality and young drivers' smartphone use while driving

kita, Erez, Luria, Gil·2018·Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.001

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
kita, E., & Luria, G.
Affiliations
  • Or Yarok Association (IL)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Luria, Gil
Venue
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
59
Pages
203-211
ISSN
1369-8478 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893609757
Cited by
87
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 2
FWCI
25.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israeli Association of the Insurance Companies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
smartphone addiction, smartphone use while driving, young drivers, personality traits, Big Five personality traits, neuroticism, openness to experience, extraversion, mediating effect, driver distraction, road safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review