Cited by 120Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Nomophobia: Is the Fear of Being without a Smartphone Associated with Problematic Use?

Open access
Kaviani, Fareed, Robards, Brady, Young, Kristie L., Koppel, Sjaan·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Mobile phones are changing behaviour, relationships, communication and the dynamics of physical environments. As such, reliance on the device for everyday activities has increased. Consequently, “nomophobia”, defined as the fear of being without one’s mobile phone, has emerged as a new phobia. The current study aimed to determine if nomophobia can increase the likelihood of problematic dependent, prohibited and dangerous mobile phone use. The sample comprised 2838 participants (males n = 1337 females n = 1501) recruited from various online platforms. The instrument used to measure nomophobia was the Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q), while problematic mobile phone use was measured using the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Questionnaire (PMPUQ-R). The findings revealed a strong positive correlation between nomophobia and all three problematic use factors. In addition to nomophobia, regression models revealed younger age and more time spent on a mobile phone per day significantly increased problematic dependency, prohibited use and dangerous use. Males were more likely to engage in prohibited and dangerous use, while no significant gender differences were found in dependent use. These findings support the need for further research into the relationship between nomophobia and specific aspects of problematic mobile phone use, such as using a mobile phone while driving.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17176024

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nomophobia is considered an antecedent variable or predictor of problematic social media use, in which fear of not being able to communicate or access these media increases negative consequences for users.

    “Therefore, nomophobia is now considered an antecedent variable or predictor of problematic social media use, in which fear (not being able to communicate or access these media) increases negative consequences for users (Kaviani et al., 2020).”

    From Problematic use of social media in adolescents or excessive social gratification? The mediating role of nomophobia (2024) · cites this paper as Kaviani et al., 2020

    The Discussion (§3.2.1; page not provided) says nomophobia can predict problematic mobile phone dependency, including fear of losing access to online connection. It does not establish nomophobia as a predictor of problematic social media use specifically; the study examines problematic phone use. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The fear of not being connected to social networks can increase the negative consequences of excessive or inappropriate social media use among adolescents.

    “Significantly, the fear of not being connected to social networks can increase the negative consequences of excessive or inappropriate social media use among adolescents (Galhardo et al., 2020;Kaviani et al., 2020).”

    From Problematic use of social media in adolescents or excessive social gratification? The mediating role of nomophobia (2024) · cites this paper as Kaviani et al., 2020

    The Discussion (§3.2; page unavailable) says that fear of being without a smartphone can predict problematic phone use, including use where phones are prohibited. But the paper does not establish that this fear increases the negative consequences of social media use among adolescents: its participants were adults aged 18 or older (§1.4.1), and its findings concern mobile-phone use rather than social-media use specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The constant gratification obtained using social networks produces negative consequences on the well-being of adolescents, such as the fear of not being connected or a negative mood.

    “The positive and significant relationship between social use and nomophobia (β = .53,p < .001)indicates that the constant gratification obtained using social networks produces negative consequences on the well-being of adolescents, such as the fear of not being connected or a negative mood (Galhardo et al., 2020;Kaviani et al., 2020).”

    From Problematic use of social media in adolescents or excessive social gratification? The mediating role of nomophobia (2024) · cites this paper as Kaviani et al., 2020

    The Discussion (§3.2, page unavailable) links dependence on a smartphone for connection and belonging with increased nomophobia, and describes feeling lost or irritated without it. It does not establish that gratification from social networks causes these outcomes in adolescents; the Results (§2.1, page unavailable) say the largest age group was 40–59. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [50]Katz J.E. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2002
  2. [72]Bauman Z. The Individualized Society Polity Press Malden, MA, USA 2001
  3. [73]Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity Polity Press Cambridge, UK 2000
  4. [74]Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge Bennington G. Massumi B. Manchester University Press Manchester, UK 1984

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaviani, F., Robards, B., Young, K. L., & Koppel, S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kaviani, Fareed
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-08-19
Volume
17
Issue
17
Pages
6024
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3050290818
Cited by
120
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
nomophobia, problematic mobile phone use, smartphone addiction, mobile phone use while driving, gender differences, age differences, daily screen time, Nomophobia Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Cell Phone Use, Adolescent, Adult, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review