Cited by 77Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentScience Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Exploring the structure of students’ scientific higher order thinking in science education

Sun, He, Xie, Yueguang, Lavonen, Jari·2022·Thinking Skills and Creativity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100999

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H., Xie, Y., & Lavonen, J.
Affiliations
  • Northeast Normal University (CN)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Xie, Yueguang
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
43
Pages
100999
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205137392
Cited by
77
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4
FWCI
33.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (BCA190074)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
science education, creative thinking, critical thinking, metacognition, science self-efficacy, scientific reasoning, junior high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review