The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond semantic distance: Automated scoring of divergent thinking greatly improves with large language models
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We measure the originality of each AUT idea with an existing fine-tuned GPT-3 classifier [44].”
From Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent Thinking (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“We chose these five particular objects as the originality scoring measure had the highest correlation with human judgements for these five objects [44].”
From Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent Thinking (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“The model was fine-tuned with human judgments of AUT originality (where human raters judged, on a scale of 1 to 5, the originality of an idea given the object) and achieved an 𝑟 = 0.81 overall correlation with human judgments.”
From Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent Thinking (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
In the citing paper
“we employ the Alternate Uses Task (AUT; Organisciak et al. (2023)), an established measurement for divergent (as in free-associative) thinking, which possesses a validated and fully automated evaluation pipeline (Organisciak et al., 2025).”
From Within-Model vs Between-Prompt Variability in Large Language Models for Creative Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as Organisciak et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 14,137
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Torrance, 1980, Growing up creatively gifted: A 22-yr longitudinal study, Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 5, 148
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration
Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Burkhardt, J., Bonnardel, N., Corazza, G. E., Glăveanu, V., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.597 · Cited by 273
Artificial muses: Generative artificial intelligence chatbots have risen to human-level creativity
Haase, J., & Hanel, P. H. P. (2023) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100066 · Cited by 233
Applying large language models and chain-of-thought for automatic scoring
Lee, G.-G., Latif, E., Wu, X., Liu, N., & Zhai, X. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100213 · Cited by 186
Fine-tuning ChatGPT for automatic scoring
Latif, E., & Zhaı, X. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100210 · Cited by 244
The originality of machines: AI takes the Torrance test
Guzik, E. E., Byrge, C., & Gilde, C. (2023) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100065 · Cited by 165
Creativity in the age of generative AI
Rafner, J., Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, J. C., Lubart, T., & Sherson, J. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01751-1 · Cited by 156
Li, T., Ji, Y., & Zhan, Z. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2305163 · Cited by 133
Li, H. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8923 · Cited by 159
Large Language Model-Powered Automated Assessment: A Systematic Review
Emirtekin, E. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15105683 · Cited by 96
Beyond Traditional Assessment: Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Grading Practices
Fagbohun, O., Iduwe, N. P., Abdullahi, M., Ifaturoti, A., & Nwanna, M. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning and Data Science · doi:10.51219/jaimld/oluwole-fagbohun/19 · Cited by 80
The Art of Creative Inquiry—From Question Asking to Prompt Engineering
Sasson-Lazovsky, G., Raz, T., & Kenett, Y. N. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.671 · Cited by 73
AuDrA: An automated drawing assessment platform for evaluating creativity
Patterson, J. D., Barbot, B., Lloyd-Cox, J., & Beaty, R. E. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02258-3 · Cited by 71
The language of creativity: Evidence from humans and large language models
Orwig, W., Edenbaum, E. R., Greene, J. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.636 · Cited by 56
Automatic Scoring of Metaphor Creativity with Large Language Models
DiStefano, P. V., Patterson, J. D., & Beaty, R. E. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2326343 · Cited by 79
Divergent creativity in humans and large language models
Bellemare-Pepin, A., Lespinasse, F., Thölke, P., Harel, Y., Mathewson, K. W., Olson, J. A., Bengio, Y., & Jerbi, K. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-25157-3 · Cited by 117
Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent Thinking
Kumar, H., Vincentius, J., Jordan, E., & Anderson, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714198 · Cited by 129
Driving Factors of Generative AI Adoption in New Product Development Teams from a UTAUT Perspective
Xia, Y., & Chen, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2375686 · Cited by 56
Wu, X., Saraf, P. P., Lee, G., Latif, E., Liu, N., & Zhaı, X. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-025-09836-8 · Cited by 62
Ashkinaze, J., Mendelsohn, J., Qiwei, L., Budak, C., & Gilbert, E. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference · doi:10.1145/3715928.3737481 · Cited by 33
AI vs humans in the AUT: Simulations to LLMs
Gilhooly, K. J. (2023) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100071 · Cited by 35
GenAI Creativity in Narrative Tasks: Exploring New Forms of Creativity
Vinchon, F., Gironnay, V., & Lubart, T. (2024) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence12120125 · Cited by 44
Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Collaborative Lesson Planning for Pre‐Service Teachers
Sun, Y., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70098 · Cited by 46
Tang, M., Hofreiter, S., Werner, C. H., Zielińska, A., & Karwowski, M. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.1519 · Cited by 32
Creativity Assessment, Research, and Practice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Acar, S. (2023) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749 · Cited by 33
Self-citationOpen and closed-ended problem solving in humans and AI: The influence of question asking complexity
Raz, T., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Kenett, Y. N. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101598 · Cited by 40
Zielińska, A., Organisciak, P., Dumas, D., & Karwowski, M. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101414 · Cited by 35
Self-citationAI as a creative partner: a PRISMA review of AI’s role in supporting creativity in education
Urmeneta, A., & Roméro, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1602151 · Cited by 27
Automated Scoring of Figural Tests of Creativity with Computer Vision
Acar, S., Organisciak, P., & Dumas, D. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.677 · Cited by 33
Self-citationYang, T., Zhang, Q., Sun, Z., & Hou, Y. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02313-z · Cited by 25
Automated Scoring of Scientific Creativity in German
Goecke, B., DiStefano, P. V., Aschauer, W., Haim, K., Beaty, R. E., & Forthmann, B. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.658 · Cited by 29
Natural language processing in educational research: The evolution of research topics
Wu, H., Li, S., Gao, Y., Weng, J., & Ding, G. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12764-2 · Cited by 23
Evaluation is Creation: Self and Social Judgments of Creativity Across the Four-C Model
Dumas, D., & Kaufman, J. C. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09947-1 · Cited by 23
Self-citationAssessing novelty, feasibility and value of creative ideas with an unsupervised approach using GPT‐4
Kern, F. B., Wu, C., & Chao, Z. C. (2024) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12720 · Cited by 22
Li, H., Liu, Y., Guo, Q., Shi, M., Zhang, P., & Kim, S. B. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13040275 · Cited by 19
Possibility Thinking Scale: An initial psychometric exploration
Glăveanu, V. P., Karwowski, M., Ross, W., & Beghetto, R. A. (2024) · Possibility Studies & Society · doi:10.1177/27538699241241827 · Cited by 20
Investigation of Response Aggregation Methods in Divergent Thinking Assessments
Saretzki, J., Andrae, R., Forthmann, B., & Benedek, M. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.1527 · Cited by 20
What Makes Children's Responses to Creativity Assessments Difficult to Judge Reliably?
Dumas, D., Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., Organisciak, P., Eby, D., Grajzel, K., Vlaamster, T., Newman, M., & Carrera, M. (2023) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.588 · Cited by 16
Self-citationWise, T., & Kenett, Y. N. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8 · Cited by 17
Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges
Corazza, G. E., Agnoli, S., Jorge Artigau, A., Beghetto, R. A., Bonnardel, N., Coletto, I., Faiella, A., Gerardini, K., Gilhooly, K., Glăveanu, V. P., et al. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13080103 · Cited by 14
Scherbakova, A., Dumas, D., Acar, S., Berthiaume, K., & Organisciak, P. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.646 · Cited by 18
Self-citationCAP: The creativity assessment platform for online testing and automated scoring
Patterson, J. D., Pronchick, J., Panchanadikar, R., Fuge, M., van Hell, J. G., Miller, S. R., Johnson, D. R., & Beaty, R. E. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02761-9 · Cited by 13
Using large language models to evaluate alternative uses task flexibility score
Hadas, E., & Hershkovitz, A. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101549 · Cited by 21
Kranzle, T., & Sharratt, K. (2025) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.70007 · Cited by 15
Large language models are homogeneously creative
Wenger, E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag042 · Cited by 100
Envisioning the Future of Creative Thinking Assessment
Benedek, M., & Beaty, R. E. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.70036 · Cited by 16
How Much Retrieval Ability Is in Originality?
Weiss, S., Goecke, B., & Wilhelm, O. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.659 · Cited by 11
Wahbeh, H., Cannard, C., Yount, G. L., Arnaud Delorme, A., & Radin, D. I. (2024) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100088 · Cited by 11
The role of alpha oscillations in free‐ and goal‐directed semantic associations
Ζιώγα, Ι., Kenett, Y. N., Giannopoulos, A., & Luft, C. D. B. (2024) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26770 · Cited by 12
Scoring German Alternate Uses Items Applying Large Language Models
Saretzki, J., Knopf, T., Forthmann, B., Goecke, B., Jaggy, A., Benedek, M., & Weiss, S. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060064 · Cited by 11
Subjective valuation as a domain-general process in creative thinking
Battistello, G., Moreno-Rodriguez, S., Volle, E., & Lopez‐Persem, A. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00285-8 · Cited by 12
van Broekhoven, K. (2023) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403 · Cited by 11
On semantic structures and processes in creative thinking
Kenett, Y. N., & Beaty, R. E. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.011 · Cited by 11
Zhang, K., Cai, S., Yang, W., Wu, W., & Shen, H. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3661501 · Cited by 10
Chen, S., & Lin, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1619489 · Cited by 10
Has the creativity of large-language models peaked?
Haase, J., Hanel, P. H. P., & Pokutta, S. (2025) · Journal of Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100113 · Cited by 25
Neural dynamics during the generation and evaluation of creative and non-creative ideas
Kenett, Y. N., Chrysikou, E. G., Bassett, D. S., & Thompson‐Schill, S. L. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09018-3 · Cited by 10
Large Language Models are Catalyzing Chemistry EducationPreprint
Du, Y., Duan, C., Bran, A. M., Sotnikova, A., Qu, Y., Kulik, H. J., Bosselut, A., Xu, J., & Schwaller, P. (2024) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-h722v · Cited by 10
McNeish, D., & Dumas, D. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02611-8 · Cited by 13
Self-citationTen Guidelines for Scoring Psychological Assessments Using Artificial Intelligence
Dumas, D., Greiff, S., & Wetzel, E. (2025) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000904 · Cited by 9
Self-citationZha, S., Qiao, Y., Hu, Q., Li, Z., Gong, J., & Xu, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103602 · Cited by 41
Arora, V., Thabane, A., Parpia, S., Calic, G., & Bhandari, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21398-4 · Cited by 15
Recognizing, evaluating, and selecting new ideas: the problematic journey of novelty
Deichmann, D., Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2024) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2024.2359383 · Cited by 8
Fuzzy Linkography: Automatic Graphical Summarization of Creative Activity Traces
Smith, A., Anderson, B. R., Otto, J., Karth, I., Sun, Y., Chung, J. J. Y., Roemmele, M., & Kreminski, M. (2025) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3698061.3726915 · Cited by 8
Zhang, L., Fang, C., Lin, H., Liang, G., & Luo, S. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102020 · Cited by 9
Investigating the Validity Evidence of Automated Scoring Methods for Divergent Thinking Assessments
Saretzki, J., & Benedek, M. (2026) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2025.2607669 · Cited by 12
The Scientific Creative Thinking Test (SCTT): Reliability, Validity, and Automated Scoring
Beaty, R. E., Cortes, R. A., Luchini, S. A., Patterson, J. D., Forthmann, B., Baker, B. S., Barbot, B., Hardiman, M. M., & Green, A. E. (2026) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2026.2639038 · Cited by 12
Reis, M., & Kunde, W. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105741 · Cited by 9
Dumas, D., Dong, Y., Kagan, S., & Campbell, W. K. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2371725 · Cited by 7
Self-citationInvestigating Lasting Effects of Real-Time Feedback on Originality and Evaluation Accuracy
de Chantal, P., Houde-Labrecque, C., Leblanc, M., & Organisciak, P. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2441014 · Cited by 10
Self-citationRunco, M., Turkman, B., Acar, S., & Alabbasi, A. M. A. (2024) · The Journal of creative behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.1528 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe Effect of Aging on Question-Asking, Divergent Thinking, and Problem-Solving Abilities
Raz, T., Diaz, M. T., & Kenett, Y. N. (2025) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2025.2498916 · Cited by 7
Campidelli, L., Domanti, U., Fusi, G., Kenett, Y. N., & Agnoli, S. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106318 · Cited by 9
Creativeable: Leveraging AI for Personalized Creativity Enhancement
Nitzav, A. K., & Kenett, Y. N. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6100247 · Cited by 8
Memmert, L., Cvetković, I., Tavanapour, N., & Bittner, E. A. C. (2025) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-025-00974-y · Cited by 7
On the Consistency of Automatic Scoring with Large Language Models
Xue, M., Xiao, X., Liu, Y., & Wilson, M. (2026) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644261418138 · Cited by 10
Luchini, S. A., Zhang, X., White, R. T., Lührs, M., Ramot, M., & Beaty, R. E. (2025) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaf065 · Cited by 9
Automated Genre-Aware Article Scoring and Feedback Using Large Language Models
Wang, C., Dong, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, R., Wang, S., & Chen, J. (2024) · International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE) · doi:10.1109/icbaie63306.2024.11116923 · Cited by 10
Seiler, J. P.-H., Elpelt, J., Ghobadi, A., Kaschube, M., & Rumpel, S. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00214-9 · Cited by 6
Grammenos, D., & Lubart, T. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11288-6 · Cited by 6
Automated Scoring of Question Complexity with Transformer Language Models
Raz, T., Luchini, S. A., Beaty, R. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102090 · Cited by 21
Can elementary school teachers assess students’ creative problem solving abilities?
van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2024) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104644 · Cited by 6
Semantic memory and creative evaluation
Skurnik, A., Ackerman, R., & Kenett, Y. N. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x · Cited by 7
AI‐Powered Scoring for Creative Thinking: Methods and Challenges in PISA Assessment
Primi, R., Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., Patterson, J. D., Caliço, T., & Piacentíni, M. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.70082 · Cited by 6
Self-citationHow Creative is This Child?: Student Demographics Affect How Teachers Rate Creativity
Kagan, S., Dumas, D., Acar, S., Organisciak, P., & Berthiaume, K. (2025) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2025.2466161 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDevelopment of the Japanese version of the inventory of creative activities and achievements
Ishiguro, C., Matsumoto, K., Agata, T., & Okada, T. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101648 · Cited by 5
The effect of nature on creativity through mental imagery
Drake, A. C., Hasan, F., Gibson, A., & Kam, J. W. Y. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315141 · Cited by 8
Odle, E., Hsueh, Y.-J., & Lin, P. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12194185 · Cited by 6
How Do Hackathons Foster Creativity? Towards Automated Evaluation of Creativity at Scale
Falk, J., Chen, Y., Rafner, J. F., Zhang, M., Bjerva, J., & Nolte, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713447 · Cited by 6
Validating LLM-based alternative uses test scoring across ages
Hadas, E., Avital-Lev, B., & Hershkovitz, A. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102066 · Cited by 4
Exploring the impact of AI features on collaborative creativity
Frich, J., Grønbæk, J. E. S., Borowski, M., & Dalsgaard, P. (2024) · Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3726986.3727015 · Cited by 6
An integrated benchmark for verbal creativity testing of LLMs and humans
Dinu, A., & Florescu, A. M. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.380 · Cited by 4
Dynamic cycles between brain states during creative storytelling
Liang, X., Cai, M., Jing, G., Zhang, C., Nichols, E. S., & Liu, L. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121053 · Cited by 4
Zhou, Z., Xiao, L., Wang, J., Tong, S., Zhang, W., & Hao, N. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70223 · Cited by 6
Sequence Generation and Evaluation: A Novel Assessment of Musical Creativity
Loui, P., Parrish, C., Wu, X., Lee, J., & Margulis, E. H. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2425494 · Cited by 5
DiStefano, P. V., Patterson, J. D., & Beaty, R. E. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101726 · Cited by 5
Automated Graphic Divergent Thinking Assessment: A Multimodal Machine Learning Approach
Zhang, H. Q., Dong, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Fan, Y., Ren, B., & Xu, J. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13040045 · Cited by 4
Haase, J., & Hanel, P. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2347778 · Cited by 4
Kandemirci, B., Beaty, R. E., Johnson, D. R., Oliver, B. R., Kovas, Y. V., & Toivainen, T. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102626 · Cited by 5
Predication of Writing Originality Based on Computational Linguistics
Yang, L., Xin, T., Zhang, S., & Yu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence10040124 · Cited by 3
Automated essay scoring to assess digital literacy competence
Anistyasari, Y., Ekohariadi, Rijanto, T., & Hidayati, S. C. (2024) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0210437 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Organisciak, P., Acar, S., Dumas, D., & Berthiaume, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of North Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Organisciak, Peter
- Venue
- Thinking Skills and Creativity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 101356
- ISSN
- 1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381487157
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 16
- FWCI
- 52.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute of Education Sciences (305A200199)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Keywords
- divergent thinking, automated grading, alternative uses task, large language models, creativity assessment, semantic distance, fine-tuning, transfer learning, few-shot prompting, zero-shot prompting, human judgment correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
