Cited by 70Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Meta-analysis in medical research: Potentials and limitations

Zwahlen, Marcel, Renehan, Andrew, Egger, Matthias·2008·Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Abstract

Meta-analysis, the statistical combination of results from several studies to produce a single estimate of a treatment effect or size of an association, continues to attract controversy. We illustrate and discuss the promises and limitations of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of clinical trials can prevent delays in the introduction of effective treatments or lead to the timely identification of adverse effects. However, meta-analyses are liable to numerous biases, both at the level of the individual study and the selection of studies for inclusion in meta-analysis. The biases and confounding factors that threaten the validity of individual studies will also affect meta-analyses of observational studies. We argue that meta-analyses should only be performed within the framework of systematic reviews that have been prepared using methods that minimize bias and address the combinability of studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.12.001

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zwahlen, M., Renehan, A., & Egger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • The Christie Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Zwahlen, Marcel
Venue
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
320-329
ISSN
1078-1439 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171657748
Cited by
70
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
meta-analysis, systematic reviews, bias in clinical trials, confounding, observational studies, treatment effect estimation, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical Oncology, Myocardial Infarction, Review Literature as Topic, Urology, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review