Cited by 149Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing Communities

The feasibility of using mobile-phone based SMS reminders and conditional cash transfers to improve timely immunization in rural Kenya

Open access
Wakadha, Hotenzia, Chandir, Subhash, Were, Elijah Victor, Rubin, Alan, Obor, David, Levine, Orin S., Gibson, Dustin G., Odhiambo, Frank +2 more·2013·Vaccine

Abstract

Background Demand-side strategies could contribute to achieving high and timely vaccine coverage in rural Africa, but require platforms to deliver either messages or conditional cash transfers (CCTs). We studied the feasibility of using short message services (SMS) reminders and mobile phone-based conditional cash transfers (CCTs) to reach parents in rural Western Kenya.Methods In a Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS), mothers with children aged 0-3 weeks old were approached to determine who had access to a mobile phone. SMS reminders were sent three days prior to and on the scheduled day of immunization for 1st (age 6 weeks) and 2nd doses (age 10 weeks) of DTP-HepB-Hib (Pentavalent) vaccine, using open-source Rapid SMS software. Approximately $2.00 USD was sent as cash using mPESA, a mobile money transfer platform (2/3 of mothers), or airtime (1/3 of mothers) via phone if the child was vaccinated within 4 weeks of the scheduled date. Follow-up surveys were done when children reached 14 weeks of age.Results We approached 77 mothers; 72 were enrolled into the study (26% owned a phone and 74% used someone else's). Of the 63 children with known vaccination status at 14 weeks of age, 57 (90%) received pentavalent1 and 54 (86%) received pentavalent2 within 4 weeks of their scheduled date. Of the 61 mothers with follow-up surveys administered at 14 weeks of age, 55 (90%) reported having received SMS reminders. Of the 54 women who reported having received SMS reminders and answered the CCT questions on the survey, 45 (83%) reported receiving their CCT. Most (89%) of mothers in the mPESA group obtained their cash within 3 days of being sent their credit via mobile phone. All mothers stated they preferred CCTs as cash via mobile phone rather than airtime. Of the 9 participants who did not vaccinate their children at the designated clinic 2(22%) cited refusals by husbands to participate in the study.Conclusion The data show that in rural Western Kenya mobile phone-based strategies are a potentially useful platform to deliver reminders and cash transfers. Follow-up studies are needed that provide evidence for the effectiveness of these strategies in improving vaccine coverage and timeliness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.093

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding causal mechanisms is particularly relevant for complex interventions such as mHealth interventions, which are implemented in vastly different healthcare settings, use various functions of mobile phones, target widely different health conditions, and are used by persons with different backgrounds, behaviors, skills, and beliefs.

    “Understanding these mechanisms is particularly relevant for complex interventions, such as mHealth interventions, which are implemented in vastly different healthcare settings (varying from rural communities [13, 14] to major university hospitals [15]), use various functions of mobile phones (from text messaging [16–18] to picture transmission [19]), target widely different health conditions (from”
  • A significant proportion of mothers were not allowed to partake in the scheme by their husbands, identifying a major potential barrier to mHealth interventions.

    “A significant proportion of mothers, however, were not allowed to partake in the scheme by their husbands, thus identifying a major potential barrier to mHealth interventions that would need to be taken into account during an intervention's design.”
  • A scheme trialled in Kenya showed that conditional cash transfers, via mobile phone, and SMS reminders, improved child vaccination rates in rural areas.

    “A scheme trialled in Kenya showed that conditional cash transfers, via mobile phone, and SMS reminders, improved child vaccination rates in rural areas (23).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakadha, H., Chandir, S., Were, E. V., Rubin, A., Obor, D., Levine, O. S., Gibson, D. G., Odhiambo, F., Laserson, K. F., & Feikin, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Feikin, Daniel R.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
987-993
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968021637
Cited by
149
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • KEMRI
  • CDC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
SMS reminders, conditional cash transfers, pentavalent vaccine, vaccination coverage, demand-side strategies, mobile money, rural Kenya
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Immunization, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Kenya, Male, Pilot Projects, Reimbursement, Incentive, Rural Population, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Reminder Systems, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Haemophilus Vaccines, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review