Cited by 102Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyVaccine Coverage and HesitancyBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Case-control vaccine effectiveness studies: Preparation, design, and enrollment of cases and controls

Open access
Verani, Jennifer R., Baqui, Abdullah H., Broome, Claire V., Cherian, Thomas, Cohen, Cheryl, Farrar, Jennifer L., Feikin, Daniel R., Groome, Michelle J. +17 more·2017·Vaccine

Abstract

Case-control studies are commonly used to evaluate effectiveness of licensed vaccines after deployment in public health programs. Such studies can provide policy-relevant data on vaccine performance under 'real world' conditions, contributing to the evidence base to support and sustain introduction of new vaccines. However, case-control studies do not measure the impact of vaccine introduction on disease at a population level, and are subject to bias and confounding, which may lead to inaccurate results that can misinform policy decisions. In 2012, a group of experts met to review recent experience with case-control studies evaluating the effectiveness of several vaccines; here we summarize the recommendations of that group regarding best practices for planning, design and enrollment of cases and controls. Rigorous planning and preparation should focus on understanding the study context including healthcare-seeking and vaccination practices. Case-control vaccine effectiveness studies are best carried out soon after vaccine introduction because high coverage creates strong potential for confounding. Endpoints specific to the vaccine target are preferable to non-specific clinical syndromes since the proportion of non-specific outcomes preventable through vaccination may vary over time and place, leading to potentially confusing results. Controls should be representative of the source population from which cases arise, and are generally recruited from the community or health facilities where cases are enrolled. Matching of controls to cases for potential confounding factors is commonly used, although should be reserved for a limited number of key variables believed to be linked to both vaccination and disease. Case-control vaccine effectiveness studies can provide information useful to guide policy decisions and vaccine development, however rigorous preparation and design is essential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.037

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using the test-negative, case-control study design.

    “Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using the test-negative, case–control study design11,12, applying methodology that was developed earlier to assess duration of protection of the BNT162b213 and mRNA-127314 vaccines in the same population during pre-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection waves (Methods).”
  • Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection during the Omicron wave in Qatar was estimated using the test-negative, case-control study design, a standard design for assessing vaccine effectiveness.

    “Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529)1 infection during the large Omicron wave in Qatar, between December 23, 2021 and February 28, 2022, was estimated using the test-negative, case–control study design, a standard design for assessing vaccine effectiveness11,12,36,40.”
  • The cohort study design applied earlier to the same population of Qatar yielded findings similar to those of the test-negative case-control design, supporting the validity of this standard approach in assessing vaccine effectiveness.

    “However, the cohort study design applied earlier to the same population of Qatar yielded findings similar to those of the test-negative case–control design36,38,39, supporting the validity of this standard approach in assessing vaccine effectiveness11,12,36,40.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [52]Rothman KJ Greenland S Lash TL Modern epidemiology 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008
  2. [66]Domingues CMAS Verani J Montenegro Renoiner E de Cunto Brandileone MC Flannery B de Oliveira L Effectiveness of ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease in Brazil: a matched case-control study Lancet Respirat Med 2014 2 6 464 71 24726406 PMC9003592
  3. [67]Baqui A El Arifeen S Saha S Persson L Zaman K Gessner B Effectiveness of Haemophilus influenzae type B conjugate vaccine on prevention of pneumonia and meningitis in Bangladeshi children: a case-control study Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007 26 7 565 71 17596795
  4. [68]de la Hoz F Higuera A Di Fabio J Luna M Naranjo A de la Luz Valencia Ma Effectiveness of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccination against bacterial pneumonia in Colombia Vaccine 2004 23 1 36 42 15519705
  5. [84]Rothman KJ Greenland S Lash TL Modern epidemiology 3rd edition Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008 168 82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verani, J. R., Baqui, A. H., Broome, C. V., Cherian, T., Cohen, C., Farrar, J. L., Feikin, D. R., Groome, M. J., Hajjeh, R. A., Johnson, H. L., Madhi, S. A., Mulholland, K., O'Brien, K. L., Parashar, U. D., Patel, M. M., Rodrigues, L. C., Santosham, M., Scott, J. A., Smith, P. G., Sommerfelt, H., Tate, J. E., Victor, J. C., Whitney, C. G., Zaidi, A. K., & Zell, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • National Institute for Communicable Diseases (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Gavi (CH)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
Corresponding author
Verani, Jennifer R.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
35
Issue
25
Pages
3295-3302
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605758023
Cited by
102
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • GAVI Alliance
  • World Health Organization
  • Wellcome Trust (098532/B/12/Z, 203077)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01IP001048)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K012126/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
vaccine effectiveness, case-control study, research design, confounding, vaccine introduction, health-seeking behavior, vaccination practices
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, Female, Humans, Male, Vaccination, Vaccines, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Immunization Programs, Control Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review