CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of heartworm: What is happening in South America and Mexico?

Labarthe, Norma, Guerrero, Jorge·2005·Veterinary Parasitology
DOI 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Canine heartworm has been known to exist in the Americas for more than 150 years (1847), and the first South American report was published approximately 30 years later (1875). The first human case was reported in 1887 and the first feline case in 1921. Coincidently, these two reports were from Brazil, where most surveys of the disease during the past two decades have been conducted in dogs. Feline cases are seldom found in the South American literature, although feline heartworm disease has been reported in Venezuela and Brazil. The prevalence in Mexico seems to be stable over the past 10 years (7.3-7.5%). Only 5 of the 13 South American countries have reported on canine heartworm infection prevalence. In Argentina, the national prevalence ranges from 3.5 to 12.7%; however, there was a much higher prevalence (17.7 and 23.5%) reported for two sections of Buenos Aires. In Lima, Peru, the prevalence is 4.35%, and Colombia reports 3.8-4.8% of dogs are infected. No infections were detected in 1056 dogs sampled in Chile. In Brazil, the national prevalence has declined from 7.9% in 1988 to 2% in 2001. The downward trend observed for canine heartworm in Brazil suggests that multiple pressures may be affecting the nematode transmission, including a possible decrease in mosquito vector population due to better control programs, reduction of transmission due to effective chemoprophylaxis, reduction of microfilaremic dog populations with the off-label use of injectable ivermectin, or reduction of the reproductive capacity of worms from tetracyclines used to control ehrlichiosis. Survey of a large population of captured mosquitoes indicated the most frequent species captured were vectors of heartworms (Aedes taeniorhynchus (73.9%), Aedes scapularis (20%) and Culex quinquefasciatus (2.5%), suggesting that the composition of the mosquito population is not a critical factor in the decrease in heartworm infections in dogs in South America.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Alcaíno, 1984, Canine filariasis in Chile, Arch. Med. Vet., XVI, 67
  2. Gonzales, J.A., 2002. Seroprevalencia de la Dirofilariosis y Ehrlichiosis Canina en los Districtos de Chorrillos, La Molina y San Juan de Miraflores. Thesis. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru, 98 pp.
  3. Lane, 1953, vol. 2
  4. Magalhães, 1997, Descripção de uma espécie de filárias encontradas nocoração humano, Rev. Cursos Prat. Theor. Fac. Med. Rio de Janeiro, 3, 129
  5. Mazza, S.Y., Romaña C., 1931. In: Bulman, G.M., González, G., Santamaría, P.E., Pampillo, F.E., Ambrústolo, R.R., Fiel, C.A. (Eds.), 1989. Prevalencia de Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) Mediante el test de Knott modificado, en 1043 canes domesticos de la Mesopotamia, Gran Buenos Aires y Capital Federal (Argentina). Veterinaria Argentina IV, pp. 144–151.
  6. Souza, 1997, Prevalência de Dirofilaria immitis em cães no município de Belém, PA, com Base na microfilaremia, Revista Brasileira de Parasitoloia Veterinária, 6, 83
  7. Travassos, 1921, Notas helmintológicas, Brazil Med., 2, 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Labarthe, N., & Guerrero, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Labarthe, Norma
ORCID
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
133
Issue
2-3
Pages
149-156
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.006
OpenAlex
W2018525654
Cited by
114
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, South America, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Colombia, feline heartworm disease, mosquito vectors, Aedes taeniorhynchus, Aedes scapularis, Culex quinquefasciatus, ivermectin, tetracycline, ehrlichiosis, chemoprophylaxis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Humans, Mexico, Mosquito Control, Culicidae, South America, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review