Cited by 35Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlParasites and Host Interactions

Therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of milbemycin oxime (interceptor) against Thelazia callipaeda in naturally exposed dogs

Ferroglio, E., Rossi, L., Tomio, E., Schenker, R., Bianciardi, P.·2008·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the therapeutic and prophylactic activity of milbemycin oxime (Interceptor, Novartis Animal Health) against the eye-worm Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) infection. In Trial 1, the therapeutic efficacy of milbemycin oxime was evaluated in 55 naturally infected dogs treated with min. 0.5mg/kg milbemycin oxime. The dogs were clinically examined for the presence of eyeworms before and again 7 days after treatment. Dogs still positive were given a second treatment and re-checked again a week later. Forty-eight of the 55 dogs tested negative 1 week after treatment (87.3% reduction of infection rate). Following the second treatment 6 of these 7 dogs tested negative 1 week later resulting, after two treatments, in a reduction of infection rate of 98.2%. In Trial 2, the prophylactic efficacy of milbemycin oxime was evaluated in 60 uninfected dogs. Thirty dogs were treated with milbemycin oxime monthly from June to November with the recommended dose rate for the prevention of heartworm disease (> or =0.5mg/kg), 30 dogs served as untreated controls. At the end of the trail 1 dog in the treated group and 10 dogs in the control group became infected during the trial. The incidence of infection differed significantly between treated and control dogs (p=0.0056). The efficacy of the prophylactic use of a monthly treatment with milbemycin oxime showed 90% efficacy in reducing T. callipaeda infection rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.011

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A monthly treatment with milbemycin oxime provides some seasonal protection against T. callipaeda infestation in dogs from an endemic area of northern Italy.

    “The administration of an injectable sustained-release formulation of moxidectin and of a monthly treatment with milbemycin oxime provided some seasonal protection against T. callipaeda infestation in dogs from an endemic area of northern Italy [121,122].”

    From Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe (2013) · cites this paper as [122]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferroglio, E., Rossi, L., Tomio, E., Schenker, R., & Bianciardi, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Ferroglio, E.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
154
Issue
3-4
Pages
351-353
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083994194
Cited by
35
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
milbemycin oxime, interceptors, Thelazia callipaeda, dogs, treatment efficacy, prophylaxis efficacy, ocular parasitic infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthelmintics, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Spirurida Infections, Macrolides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review